Lindsay A. Vasquez v. Aramark Campus LLC et al
Lindsay A. Vasquez |
Aramark Campus LLC and Does 1 through 50, inclusive |
8:2023cv01306 |
July 19, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John W Holcomb |
Douglas F McCormick |
Labor: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against DEFENDANT All Defendants amending Complaint - (Discovery), filed by PLAINTIFF Lindsay A. Vasquez(Lucio, Christina) |
![]() |
Filing 16 STIPULATION for Leave to File Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff Lindsay A. Vasquez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Proposed Amended Complaint, #2 Proposed Order)(Lucio, Christina) |
![]() |
Filing 14 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Aramark Campus LLC answer now due 8/28/2023, filed by defendant Aramark Campus LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order to Extend Time to Answer Initial Complaint)(Meckley, Eric) |
Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Aramark Campus LLC answer now due 8/21/2023, filed by Defendant Aramark Campus LLC.(Meckley, Eric) |
Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Aramark Campus LLC, re Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only #11 served on July 24, 2023. (Meckley, Eric) |
![]() |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Aramark Campus LLC, re Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #7 , Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #8 , Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form #9 served on July 21, 2023. (Meckley, Eric) |
Filing 9 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John W. Holcomb and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (car) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Aramark Campus LLC, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #3 , Notice (Other) #4 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 served on July 20, 2023. (Meckley, Eric) |
Filing 5 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to filed by Defendant Aramark Campus LLC.(Meckley, Eric) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Aramark Campus LLC, Does 1-50, inclusive. Jury Demanded, filed by plaintiff Lindsay A. Vasquez. Filed in State Court on 5/10/2023 Submitted with Attachment 1 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
Filing 4 Notice of Pendency of Other Actions or Proceedings filed by Defendant Aramark Campus LLC. (Meckley, Eric) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Aramark Campus LLC identifying Aramark as Corporate Parent. (Meckley, Eric) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Aramark Campus LLC. (Meckley, Eric) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2023-01324570 Receipt No: ACACDC-35703057 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Aramark Campus LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Declaration of Amy Golembo in Support of Notice of Removal, #3 Declaration of Roxanne Tucker in Support of Notice of Removal) (Attorney Eric Meckley added to party Aramark Campus LLC(pty:dft))(Meckley, Eric) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.