Samira Kharazihayeisfahani et al v. Antony J. Blinken et al
| Samira Kharazihayeisfahani and Amir Hajnorouzali |
| Antony J. Blinken, Julie M. Stufft and Jayne Howell |
| 8:2023cv01325 |
| July 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER Granting Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Complaint #11 , by Judge David O. Carter. Defendant Antony J. Blinken answer due 11/16/2023; Jayne Howell answer due 11/16/2023; Julie M. Stufft answer due 11/16/2023. (twdb)
|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Defendant's Response to Complaint filed by Defendant Antony J. Blinken, Jayne Howell, Julie M. Stufft. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Jason Kyle Zubata added to party Antony J. Blinken(pty:res), Attorney Jason Kyle Zubata added to party Jayne Howell(pty:res), Attorney Jason Kyle Zubata added to party Julie M. Stufft(pty:res))(Zubata, Jason) |
| Filing 10 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Oil Appellate counsel for Respondents Antony J. Blinken, Jayne Howell, Julie M. Stufft. Filed by Respondent Blinken, et al. (Attorney Oil Appellate added to party Antony J. Blinken(pty:res), Attorney Oil Appellate added to party Jayne Howell(pty:res), Attorney Oil Appellate added to party Julie M. Stufft(pty:res))(Appellate, Oil) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Samira Kharazihayeisfahani, Amir Hajnorouzali, upon Defendant Antony J. Blinken served on 8/2/2023, answer due 10/2/2023; Jayne Howell served on 8/2/2023, answer due 10/2/2023; Julie M. Stufft served on 8/2/2023, answer due 10/2/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jayne Howell, Antony Blinken, Julie Stufft, US Attorney, US Attorney General in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by method of service not specified. Original Summons returned. (Morrison, Curtis) |
| Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER. (kdu) |
| Filing 7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Respondents Antony J. Blinken, Jayne Howell, Julie M. Stufft. (et) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (et) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Petitioner-Plaintiffs Amir Hajnorouzali, Samira Kharazihayeisfahani. (Morrison, Curtis) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Petitioner-Plaintiffs Amir Hajnorouzali, Samira Kharazihayeisfahani, (Morrison, Curtis) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Petitioners Amir Hajnorouzali, Samira Kharazihayeisfahani. (Morrison, Curtis) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF Receipt No: ACACDC-35722467 - Fee: $402, filed by Petitioner-Plaintiffs Samira Kharazihayeisfahani, Amir Hajnorouzali. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Attorney Curtis Lee Morrison added to party Amir Hajnorouzali(pty:pet), Attorney Curtis Lee Morrison added to party Samira Kharazihayeisfahani(pty:pet))(Morrison, Curtis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
