Lien Thi Le Le et al v. Ur M. Jaddou
Plaintiff: Lien Thi Le Le and Minh Ho Le
Defendant: Ur M. Jaddou
Case Number: 8:2023cv01426
Filed: August 7, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Cormac J Carney
Referring Judge: Autumn D Spaeth
Nature of Suit: Naturalization Application
Cause of Action: 08 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Application for Naturalization Hearing
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 13, 2023 Filing 10 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Siu P. Wong counsel for Defendant Ur M. Jaddou. Adding Siu Wong as counsel of record for Defendant for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Ur M. Jaddou. (Attorney Siu P. Wong added to party Ur M. Jaddou(pty:dft))(Wong, Siu)
September 12, 2023 Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiffs Lien Thi Le Le, Minh Ho Le. Dismissal is without prejudice. (Wolfsdorf, Bernard)
August 30, 2023 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Oil Appellate on behalf of Defendant Ur M. Jaddou (Attorney Oil Appellate added to party Ur M. Jaddou(pty:dft))(Appellate, Oil)
August 10, 2023 Filing 7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Ur M. Jaddou. (et)
August 10, 2023 Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et)
August 10, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (et)
August 7, 2023 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Lien Thi Le Le, Minh Ho Le. (Wolfsdorf, Bernard)
August 7, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Lien Thi Le Le, Minh Ho Le, identifying none. (Wolfsdorf, Bernard)
August 7, 2023 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Lien Thi Le Le, Minh Ho Le. (Wolfsdorf, Bernard)
August 7, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35805074 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiffs Lien Thi Le Le, Minh Ho Le. (Attorney Bernard Pavel Wolfsdorf added to party Lien Thi Le Le(pty:pla), Attorney Bernard Pavel Wolfsdorf added to party Minh Ho Le(pty:pla))(Wolfsdorf, Bernard)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lien Thi Le Le et al v. Ur M. Jaddou
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lien Thi Le Le
Represented By: Bernard Pavel Wolfsdorf
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Minh Ho Le
Represented By: Bernard Pavel Wolfsdorf
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ur M. Jaddou
Represented By: Siu P. Wong
Represented By: Ernesto Molina
Represented By: OIL-DCS Trial Attorney
Represented By: Oil Appellate
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?