Zhijuan Tu v. Alejandro Mayorkas et al
Zhijuan Tu |
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Rosemary Langley Melville, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and United States Department of Homeland Security |
8:2023cv01485 |
August 11, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John D Early |
Dean D Pregerson |
Other Immigration Actions |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by plaintiff Zhijuan Tu. Dismissal is without prejudice. (Fan, Zhenxiong) |
Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Zhijuan Tu, upon Defendant Ur Mendoza Jaddou served on 8/28/2023, answer due 10/27/2023; Alejandro Mayorkas served on 8/28/2023, answer due 10/27/2023; Rosemary Langley Melville served on 8/28/2023, answer due 10/27/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Fan, Zhenxiong) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Oil Appellate on behalf of Defendants Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Rosemary Langley Melville, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Homeland Security (Attorney Oil Appellate added to party Ur Mendoza Jaddou(pty:dft), Attorney Oil Appellate added to party Alejandro Mayorkas(pty:dft), Attorney Oil Appellate added to party Rosemary Langley Melville(pty:dft), Attorney Oil Appellate added to party United States Citizenship and Immigration Services(pty:dft), Attorney Oil Appellate added to party United States Department of Homeland Security(pty:dft))(Appellate, Oil) |
Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Dean D. Pregerson. Counsel must refer to the Central Districts website at http://www.cacd.uscourts.gov for Judge Dean D.Pregerson's Procedures and Schedules. Counsel must review the Court's Standing Order and CV Trial Order, and comply with the same. The Court hears motions only on Mondays at 10:00 a.m. It is not necessary to clear a motion date with the Court Clerk prior to filing a motion. Counsel are required to comply with C.D. Cal. L.R. 5-4.4.1 through 5-4.4.2. See order for more information. (shb) |
Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Rosemary Langley Melville, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Homeland Security. (et) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dean D. Pregerson and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (et) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Zhijuan Tu, (Fan, Zhenxiong) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Zhijuan Tu. (Fan, Zhenxiong) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Zhijuan Tu. (Fan, Zhenxiong) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35841000 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Zhijuan Tu. (Attorney Zhenxiong Fan added to party Zhijuan Tu(pty:pla))(Fan, Zhenxiong) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.