Moises Villalobos v. Graymar, Inc et al
| Moises Villalobos |
| Graymar, Inc and Does 1 to 10 |
| Roes |
| 8:2023cv01660 |
| September 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Karen E Scott |
| Fred W Slaughter |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ORDER SETTING RULE 26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fred W. Slaughter: Scheduling Conference is set for 1/4/2024 at 9:00 AM. See Order for details. (ev)
|
| Filing 16 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Graymar, Inc, (Czech, Jeffery) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Answer to Complaint #13 , Crossclaim #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: (1) No notice of interested parties. (2) Counsel must comply with Local Rule 7.1-1. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (jp) |
| Filing 14 COUNTERCLAIM (FILED AS CROSSCLAIM) against Counter-Defendant Moises Villalobos, filed by Counter claimant Graymar, Inc. (Czech, Jeffery). Modified on 11/1/2023 (jp). |
| Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Graymar, Inc.(Attorney Jeffery Joseph Czech added to party Graymar, Inc(pty:dft))(Czech, Jeffery) |
|
Filing 12
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER Dismissing Plaintiff's State Law Claims by Judge Fred W. Slaughter: The court DISMISSES Plaintiff's state law claims WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to any action filed in state court. (jp)
|
| Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Moises Villalobosto Order to Show Cause,, #10 re: Supplemental Jurisdiction (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration)(Kim, Jason) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. Given relevant authority on the court's exercise of supplemental jurisdiction, including but not limited to Ninth Circuit's decisions in Arroyo v. Rosas, 19 F.4th 1202 (9th Cir. 2021) and Vo v. Choi, 49 F.4th 1167 (9th Cir. 2022), the court ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause in writing why this court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims asserted in the Complaint on or before September 20, 2023, at 5:00 p.m. (See document for further information). (aco)
|
|
Filing 9
CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. (mku)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Graymar, Inc. (lh) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fred W. Slaughter and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (lh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Moises Villalobos. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Moises Villalobos. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35995036 - Fee: $402. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party Moises Villalobos(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
