Don Dao v. Harvest Small Business Finance, LLC et al
Don Dao |
Harvest Small Business Finance, LLC and Does 1- 10, inclusive |
Premier International Law Group P C |
8:2023cv01663 |
September 6, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Cormac J Carney |
Autumn D Spaeth |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Counter Defendant Don Dao, re Answer to Counterclaim #23 served on 10/26/2023. (jp) |
Filing 23 ANSWER to Counterclaim #17 filed by Counter Defendant Don Dao.(jp) |
Filing 22 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Counter Claimant Harvest Small Business Finance, LLC, upon Counterdefendant Premier International Law Group P C served on 10/18/2023, answer due 11/8/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Don Dao, Principal in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy (McWhorter, Robert) |
Filing 21 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Harvest Small Business Finance, LLC, re Counterclaim, #17 served on 10/13/2023. (Osborne-Revis, Jarrett) |
Filing 20 21 DAY Summons Issued re Counterclaim, #17 as to Counter Defendant Premier International Law Group P C. (twdb) |
Filing 19 NOTICE OF INTENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney. Scheduling order to be issued on December 14, 2023. (dta) |
Filing 18 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Counterclaim, #17 filed by Counter Claimant Harvest Small Business Finance, LLC. (Osborne-Revis, Jarrett) |
Filing 17 COUNTERCLAIM against Counter Defendants Don Dao, Premier International Law Group, P.C.aw, filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Harvest Small Business Finance, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C)(Osborne-Revis, Jarrett) |
Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Harvest Small Business Finance, LLC, re Answer to Complaint (Discovery) #15 served on 10/13/2023. (Osborne-Revis, Jarrett) |
Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Harvest Small Business Finance, LLC.(Osborne-Revis, Jarrett) |
|
Filing 13 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause RE Preliminary Injunction Relief filed by plaintiff Don Dao. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (twdb) |
Filing 12 OPPOSTION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO REMOVE CASE TO FEDERAL COURT; AND DECLARATION OF DON DAO filed by plaintiff Don Dao. (rolm) |
Filing 11 OPPOSTION TO DEFENDANT'S STIPULATION TO REMOVE CASE TO FEDERAL COURT; AND TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT BY NOT MORE THAN 30 DAYS filed by plaintiff Don Dao. (rolm) |
Filing 10 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Harvest Small Business Finance, LLC answer now due 10/13/2023, filed by Defendant Harvest Small Business Finance, LLC.(Osborne-Revis, Jarrett) |
Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Harvest Small Business Finance, LLC, re Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #6 , Intradistrict Transfer - Clerical Error (G-73) - optional html form, #5 , Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form #8 , Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #7 served on 9/7/2023. (Osborne-Revis, Jarrett) |
Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (sh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Southern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Cormac J. Carney for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Autumn D. Spaeth. New Case Number 8:23-cv-1663 CJC (ADSx). (sh) |
Filing 4 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Harvest Small Business Finance, LLC, re Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #3 served on 9/7/2023. (Osborne-Revis, Jarrett) |
CONFORMED EFILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Harvest Small Business Finance, LLC.Case assigned to Judge Cormac J. Carney for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth., filed by Plaintiff Don Dao. [FILED IN STATE COURT 08/07/2023 SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 1 TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ] (sh) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Harvest Small Business Finance, LLC (Osborne-Revis, Jarrett) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Harvest Small Business Finance, LLC. (Osborne-Revis, Jarrett) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County, case number 30-2023-01340540 Receipt No: ACACDC-35990456 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Harvest Small Business Finance, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 - Summons, #3 Exhibit 3 - Civil Case Cover Sheet, #4 Exhibit 4 - Notice of CMC, #5 Exhibit 5 - Payment Receipt, #6 Exhibit 6 - Notice of Pendency of Action, #7 Exhibit 7 - Minute Order, #8 Exhibit 8 - Clerk's Certificate of Notice) (Attorney Jarrett Osborne-Revis added to party Harvest Small Business Finance, LLC(pty:dft))(Osborne-Revis, Jarrett) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.