Hoang Minh Le v. Mountain 60 Crossroads Center, L.P.
| Hoang Minh Le |
| Mountain 60 Crossroads Center, L.P. |
| 8:2023cv01691 |
| September 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Karen E Scott |
| John F Walter |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Attorney for Defendant Mountain 60 Crossroads Center, L.P., (Danet, Dan) |
Filing 14
Text Entry Order by Judge John F. Walter in response to the Clerk's Notice of Deficiency #13 - Counsel shall file a notice of interested parties immediately in order to avoid further action by the Court. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Stipulation #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7-1.1 no notice of interested parties. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. (iv) |
| Filing 12 DECLARATION of Dan T. Danet Lead Trial Counsel for Defendant filed by Defendant Mountain 60 Crossroads Center, L.P.. (Danet, Dan) |
| Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Mountain 60 Crossroads Center, L.P. answer now due 11/25/2023, filed by Attorney for Defendant Mountain 60 Crossroads Center, L.P..(Attorney Dan Tudor Danet added to party Mountain 60 Crossroads Center, L.P.(pty:dft))(Danet, Dan) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Hoang Minh Le, upon Defendant Mountain 60 Crossroads Center, L.P. served on 10/5/2023, answer due 10/26/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Sheila Davis - Office Administrator in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy (Tsao, Pamela) |
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. (iv)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Mountain 60 Crossroads Center, L.P. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by plaintiff Hoang Minh Le. (Tsao, Pamela) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Hoang Minh Le, (Tsao, Pamela) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Hoang Minh Le. (Tsao, Pamela) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36023062 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff MOUNTAIN 60 CROSSROADS CENTER, L.P., a limited partnership. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Photos) (Attorney Pamela Tsao added to party MOUNTAIN 60 CROSSROADS CENTER, L.P., a limited partnership(pty:dft))(Tsao, Pamela) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
