Christian Mack et al v. David Roman et al
Plaintiff: Christian Mack, Lotus Domaine Management, LLC and Lotus Domaine Management LLC
Defendant: David Roman and Does 1-50 inclusive
Case Number: 8:2023cv01738
Filed: September 18, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: David O Carter
Referring Judge: John D Early
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 4, 2023 Filing 31 Receipt of REMAND LETTER (twdb)
September 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: Denying #25 Non-Resident Attorney Mary P. Hansen APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of David Roman Defendant. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the pro hac vice application fee, if paid, be refunded. Terming Attorney Mary P. Hansen. (twdb)
September 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: Denying #24 Non-Resident Attorney Michael J. Rinaldi APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of David Roman Defendant. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the pro hac vice application fee, if paid, be refunded. Terming Attorney Karen Lehmann Alexander and Michael J. Rinaldi. (twdb)
September 26, 2023 Filing 28 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Michael J. Rinaldi to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant David Roman (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-36089211) #24 , APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Mary P. Hansen to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant David Roman (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-36089541) #25 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 83-2.1.3.4 Local counsel does not maintain an office within the District. (lt)
September 22, 2023 Filing 25 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Mary P. Hansen to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant David Roman (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-36089541) filed by Defendant David Roman. (Alexander, Karen)
September 22, 2023 Filing 24 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Michael J. Rinaldi to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant David Roman (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-36089211) filed by Defendant David Roman. (Alexander, Karen)
September 21, 2023 Filing 27 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Superior Court of California, County of Orange. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Superior Court of California, County of Orange. (twdb)
September 21, 2023 Filing 26 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge David O. Carter: ORDER SUA SPONTE REMANDING THE CASE TO STATE COURT AND DENYING PENDING MOTIONS AS MOOT #11 , #13 , #18 . The Court hereby REMANDS this action back to the Superior Court for the County of Orange. MD JS-6, Case Terminated. (twdb)
September 21, 2023 Filing 23 SUPPLEMENT Declaration of T. Samantha Tran in Support of Opposition (ECF Dkt 20) filed by Defendant David Roman. (Sutro, Stephen)
September 21, 2023 Filing 22 SUPPLEMENT Declaration of Brett Paulson in Support of Opposition (ECF Dkt 20) filed by Defendant David Roman. (Sutro, Stephen)
September 21, 2023 Filing 21 SUPPLEMENT Declaration of David Roman in Support of Opposition (ECF Dkt 20) filed by Defendant David Roman. (Sutro, Stephen)
September 21, 2023 Filing 20 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to Order to Show Cause re Preliminary Injunction filed by Defendant David Roman. (Sutro, Stephen)
September 21, 2023 Filing 19 SEALED DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATION to file document in support of Defendants Opposition to Order to Show Cause Why a Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue under seal #18 filed by Defendant David Roman. (Attachments: #1 Unredacted Document Exhibits A and B to the Declaration of David Roman in support of Defendants Opposition to Order to Show Cause Why a Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue, #2 Unredacted Document Exhibits A and F to the Declaration of Brett Paulson in support of Defendants Opposition to Order to Show Cause Why a Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue, #3 Proof of Service)(Alexander, Karen)
September 21, 2023 Filing 18 APPLICATION to file document in support of Defendants Opposition to Order to Show Cause Why a Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue under seal filed by Defendant David Roman. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Karen Alexander, #2 Redacted Document Exs A and B to the Declaration of David Roman in Support of Defendants Opposition to Order to Show Cause Why a Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue, #3 Redacted Document Exs A and F to the Declaration of Brett Paulson in Support of Defendants Opposition to Order to Show Cause Why a Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue, #4 Proposed Order)(Alexander, Karen)
September 20, 2023 Filing 17 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Lotus Domaine Management LLC, Christian Mack, identifying Lotus Domaine Management, LLC, Christian Mack and David Roman. (Samini, Bobby)
September 20, 2023 Filing 16 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re EX PARTE APPLICATION for Relief from To Dissolve Temporary Restraining Order #13 filed by Plaintiffs Lotus Domaine Management LLC, Christian Mack. (Samini, Bobby)
September 20, 2023 Filing 15 OPPOSITION to EX PARTE APPLICATION for Relief from To Dissolve Temporary Restraining Order #13 filed by Plaintiffs Lotus Domaine Management LLC, Christian Mack. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Bobby Samini, #2 Declaration Declaration of Christian Mack, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 1 to Declaration of Christian Mack)(Samini, Bobby)
September 20, 2023 Filing 14 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening docket entry no. 9 issued in error as to Certificate of Interested Parties. Certificate of Interested Parties docketed as Docket Entry. 2-1. Please disregard Deficiency. Re: Deficiency in Attorney Case Opening - optional html form, #9 (sh)
September 19, 2023 Filing 13 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Relief from To Dissolve Temporary Restraining Order filed by Defendant David Roman. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Karen Alexander in Support of Ex Parte Application, #2 Proposed Order Granting Ex Parte Application, #3 Memorandum Proposed Motion to Dissolve TRO, #4 Declaration of David Roman in Support of Proposed Motion to Dissolve TRO, #5 Declaration of Brett Paulson in Support of Proposed Motion to Dissolve TRO, #6 Declaration of T. Samantha Tran in Support of Proposed Motion to Dissolve TRO, #7 Proposed Order Granting Motion to Dissolve TRO) (Sutro, Stephen)
September 19, 2023 Filing 12 SEALED DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATION to file document in Support of Motion to Dissolve TRO under seal #11 filed by Defendant David Roman. (Attachments: #1 Unredacted Document Exs A and B to the Declaration of David Roman in Support of Motion to Dissolve, #2 Unredacted Document Exs A and F to the Declaration of Brett Paulson in Support of Motion to Dissolve, #3 Proof of Service)(Alexander, Karen)
September 19, 2023 Filing 11 APPLICATION to file document in Support of Motion to Dissolve TRO under seal filed by Defendant David Roman. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of David Roman in Support of Unopposed Application for File Under Seal, #2 Redacted Document Exs A and B to the Declaration of David Roman in Support of Motion to Dissolve, #3 Redacted Document Exs A and F to the Declaration of Brett Paulson in Support of Motion to Dissolve, #4 Proposed Order)(Alexander, Karen)
September 19, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE DAVID O. CARTER by Judge David O. Carter. (kdu)
September 19, 2023 Filing 9 [NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR DOCKETED ON 09/20/2023 SEE DOCKET ENTRY NO. #14 ] NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (sh) Modified on 9/20/2023 (sh).
September 19, 2023 Filing 8 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Mary P. Hansen. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (sh)
September 19, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney William M. McSwain. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (sh)
September 19, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Michael J. Rinaldi. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (sh)
September 19, 2023 Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh)
September 19, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh)
September 19, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (sh)
September 18, 2023 CONFORMED EFILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, David Roman., filed by Plaintiffs Christian Mack, Lotus Domaine Management LLC.[FILED IN STATE COURT 08/21/2023 SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 1 EXHIBIT 1 TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ] (sh)
September 18, 2023 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant David Roman. (Attachments: #1 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties, #2 Proof of Service)(Sutro, Stephen)
September 18, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County, case number 30-2023-01344560-CU-CO-CJC Receipt No: ACACDC-36062020 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant David Roman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14) (Attorney Stephen H Sutro added to party David Roman(pty:dft))(Sutro, Stephen)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Christian Mack et al v. David Roman et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christian Mack
Represented By: Bobby Samini
Represented By: Andrew M Sussman
Represented By: Ignacio J Lazo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lotus Domaine Management, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lotus Domaine Management LLC
Represented By: Bobby Samini
Represented By: Andrew M Sussman
Represented By: Ignacio J Lazo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Roman
Represented By: Stephen H Sutro
Represented By: Karen Lehmann Alexander
Represented By: Mary P. Hansen
Represented By: Michael J. Rinaldi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-50 inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?