Roadwire, Inc. et al v. Douglas Mahaffey et al
Roadwire, Inc., Roadwire, LLC and Classic Soft Trim, Inc. |
Mahaffey Law Group, PC, Does 1-20, inclusive and Douglas Mahaffey |
8:2023cv01773 |
September 21, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Western Division. Case has been assigned to Judge John A. Kronstadt for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Alka Sagar. New Case Number 2:23-cv-8003 JAK (ASx). (ghap) |
Filing 3 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Douglas Mahaffey, Mahaffey Law Group, PC, (Mahaffey, Douglas) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Douglas Mahaffey, Mahaffey Law Group, PC. (Mahaffey, Douglas) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number 22STCV38474 Receipt No: ACACDC-36086734 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Douglas Mahaffey, Mahaffey Law Group, PC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - State Court Complaint) (Attorney Douglas L Mahaffey added to party Douglas Mahaffey(pty:dft), Attorney Douglas L Mahaffey added to party Mahaffey Law Group, PC(pty:dft))(Mahaffey, Douglas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.