Carlos Ruano v. Avenue5 Residential LLC et al
Carlos Ruano |
Avenue5 Residential LLC and Does 1 through 100, inclusive |
8:2023cv01865 |
October 3, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Labor: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Western Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Mark C. Scarsi for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Charles F. Eick. New Case Number 2:23-cv-08462-MCS-Ex. (car) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Avenue5 Residential LLC. Related Case(s): 5:23-cv-01591 (Montazeri, Nina) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Avenue5 Residential LLC, (Montazeri, Nina) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Avenue5 Residential LLC. (Montazeri, Nina) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 22STCV39521 Receipt No: ACACDC-36157255 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Avenue5 Residential LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-R) (Attorney Nina Montazeri added to party Avenue5 Residential LLC(pty:dft))(Montazeri, Nina) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.