Carolyn Marco v. Truist Bank et al
| Carolyn Marco |
| Truist Bank, Transworld Systems Inc., Simm Associates, Inc., Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Trans Union, LLC, Equifax Information Services, LLC, Simm Associates Inc., Experian Information Solutions Inc., Trans Union LLC and Equifax Information Services LLC |
| 8:2023cv01897 |
| October 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Karen E Scott |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Carolyn Marco, identifying Defendants Truist Bank, Transworld Systems, Inc., Simm Associates, Inc., Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Trans Union, LLC, Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Amini, Mona) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Carolyn Marco. (Attachments: #1 Summons Request, #2 Summons Request, #3 Summons Request, #4 Summons Request, #5 Summons Request)(Amini, Mona) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Carolyn Marco. (Amini, Mona) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36183404 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Carolyn Marco. (Attorney Mona Amini added to party Carolyn Marco(pty:pla))(Amini, Mona) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
