Little Orbit, Inc. v. Ultimax Digital, Inc. et al
Little Orbit, Inc. |
Ultimax Digital, Inc. and Does 1-20, inclusive |
8:2023cv01969 |
October 20, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
David O Carter |
Karen E Scott |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Ultimax Digital, Inc. (lh) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (lh) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Little Orbit, Inc.. (Richardson, Michael) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Movant Little Orbit, Inc. identifying None as Corporate Parent. (Richardson, Michael) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Movant Little Orbit, Inc.. (Richardson, Michael) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36260532 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Little Orbit, Inc.. (Attorney Michael Danton Richardson added to party Little Orbit, Inc.(pty:bkmov))(Richardson, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.