Merihan Emad Aboukamar et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
| Merihan Emad Aboukamar, Farida Khaled Abdelshafy and Khaled Ahmed Abdelshafy |
| United States Department of Homeland Security, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, Los Angeles Asylum Office, David Radel, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M JADDOU, Ted H. Kim, Matthew D. Emrich, Christopher A Wray, DOES 1 through 10 inclusive, Ur M. Jaddou and DOES 1-10 |
| 8:2023cv02032 |
| October 31, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
ORDER by Judge David O. Carter, Granting Joint Stipulation to Stay Case Pending Adjudication of Application #17 . Action stayed until 4/22/25. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (twdb)
|
| Filing 18 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott to Judge David O. Carter for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 8:23-cv-02032-DOC (ADSx). (et) |
| Filing 17 Joint STIPULATION to Stay Case pending Adjudication of Application filed by Defendants DOES, Matthew D. Emrich, Ur M. Jaddou, Ted H. Kim, Los Angeles Asylum Office, Alejandro Mayorkas, David Radel, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Homeland Security, Christopher A Wray. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney David Kim added to party DOES(pty:dft), Attorney David Kim added to party Matthew D. Emrich(pty:dft), Attorney David Kim added to party Ur M. Jaddou(pty:dft), Attorney David Kim added to party Ted H. Kim(pty:dft), Attorney David Kim added to party Los Angeles Asylum Office(pty:dft), Attorney David Kim added to party Alejandro Mayorkas(pty:dft), Attorney David Kim added to party David Radel(pty:dft), Attorney David Kim added to party United States Citizenship and Immigration Services(pty:dft), Attorney David Kim added to party United States Department of Homeland Security(pty:dft), Attorney David Kim added to party Christopher A Wray(pty:dft))(Kim, David) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Oil Appellate on behalf of Defendants Matthew D. Emrich, Ur M. Jaddou, Ted H. Kim, Los Angeles Asylum Office, Alejandro Mayorkas, David Radel, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Homeland Security, Christopher A Wray (Attorney Oil Appellate added to party Matthew D. Emrich(pty:dft), Attorney Oil Appellate added to party Ur M. Jaddou(pty:dft), Attorney Oil Appellate added to party Ted H. Kim(pty:dft), Attorney Oil Appellate added to party Los Angeles Asylum Office(pty:dft), Attorney Oil Appellate added to party Alejandro Mayorkas(pty:dft), Attorney Oil Appellate added to party David Radel(pty:dft), Attorney Oil Appellate added to party United States Citizenship and Immigration Services(pty:dft), Attorney Oil Appellate added to party United States Department of Homeland Security(pty:dft), Attorney Oil Appellate added to party Christopher A Wray(pty:dft))(Appellate, Oil) |
| Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Khaled Ahmed Abdelshafy, Farida Khaled Abdelshafy, Merihan Emad Aboukamar, upon Defendant United States Department of Homeland Security served on 11/9/2023, answer due 1/8/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Office of General Counsel. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. 11/16/2023 (Thomas, Gihan) |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Khaled Ahmed Abdelshafy, Farida Khaled Abdelshafy, Merihan Emad Aboukamar, upon Defendant Ur M. Jaddou served on 11/9/2023, answer due 1/8/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Office of General Counsel. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. 11/16/2023 (Thomas, Gihan) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Khaled Ahmed Abdelshafy, Farida Khaled Abdelshafy, Merihan Emad Aboukamar, upon Defendant United States Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 11/9/2023, answer due 1/8/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Office of General Counsel. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. 11/16/2023 (Thomas, Gihan) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Khaled Ahmed Abdelshafy, Farida Khaled Abdelshafy, Merihan Emad Aboukamar, upon Defendant Ted H. Kim served on 11/9/2023, answer due 1/8/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Office of General Counsel. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. 11/16/2023 (Thomas, Gihan) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Khaled Ahmed Abdelshafy, Farida Khaled Abdelshafy, Merihan Emad Aboukamar, upon Defendant Matthew D. Emrich served on 11/9/2023, answer due 1/8/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Office of General Counsel. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. 11/16/2023 (Thomas, Gihan) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Khaled Ahmed Abdelshafy, Farida Khaled Abdelshafy, Merihan Emad Aboukamar, upon Defendant Los Angeles Asylum Office served on 11/13/2023, answer due 1/12/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Office of General Counsel. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. 11/16/2023 (Thomas, Gihan) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Khaled Ahmed Abdelshafy, Farida Khaled Abdelshafy, Merihan Emad Aboukamar, upon Defendant David Radel served on 11/9/2023, answer due 1/8/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Office of General Counsel. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. 11/16/2023 (Thomas, Gihan) |
| Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Khaled Ahmed Abdelshafy, Farida Khaled Abdelshafy, Merihan Emad Aboukamar, upon Defendant Christopher A Wray served on 11/9/2023, answer due 1/8/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Attorney General. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. 11/16/2023 (Thomas, Gihan) |
| Filing 7 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Khaled Ahmed Abdelshafy, Farida Khaled Abdelshafy, Merihan Emad Aboukamar, upon Defendant Alejandro Mayorkas served on 11/13/2023, answer due 1/12/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Office of General Counsel. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. 11/16/2023 (Thomas, Gihan) |
| Filing 6 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendants Matthew D. Emrich, Ur M. Jaddou, Ted H. Kim, Los Angeles Asylum Office, Alejandro Mayorkas, David Radel, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Homeland Security and Christopher A Wray. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (Attachments: #1 CV11C) (jtil) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #3 filed by Plaintiff Farida Khaled Abdelshafy, Khaled Ahmed Abdelshafy, Merihan Emad Aboukamar. (Thomas, Gihan) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Farida Khaled Abdelshafy, Khaled Ahmed Abdelshafy, Merihan Emad Aboukamar. (Thomas, Gihan) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Farida Khaled Abdelshafy, Khaled Ahmed Abdelshafy, Merihan Emad Aboukamar, (Thomas, Gihan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36324801 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Khaled Ahmed Abdelshafy, Farida Khaled Abdelshafy, Merihan Emad Aboukamar. (Attorney Gihan L Thomas added to party Farida Khaled Abdelshafy(pty:pla), Attorney Gihan L Thomas added to party Khaled Ahmed Abdelshafy(pty:pla), Attorney Gihan L Thomas added to party Merihan Emad Aboukamar(pty:pla))(Thomas, Gihan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
