Susanne K. Hopper v. Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S. Inc. et al
| Susanne K Hopper |
| Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc., Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. a Florida Corporation doing business as Disneyland and Does 1 through 100 inclusive |
| 8:2023cv02037 |
| October 31, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John W Holcomb |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #6 filed by Plaintiff Susanne K Hopper. (Attachments: #1 Letter Proof of Service of Opposition)(Attorney James Joseph added to party Susanne K Hopper(pty:pla))(Joseph, James) |
Filing 14
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John W. Holcomb. Scheduling Conference set for 1/19/2024 at 9:00 AM before Judge John W. Holcomb. (cla)
|
| Filing 13 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge John W. Holcomb: On its own motion, the Court SETS a hearing on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Case [ECF No. 6] for Friday, January 19, 2024, at 9:00 a.m. The parties are DIRECTED to appear in person in Courtroom 9D, on the 9th Floor of the Ronald Reagan Federal Building and United States Courthouse at 411 W. Fourth Street Santa Ana, CA 92701. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cla) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
|
Filing 12
STANDING ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb. (cla)
|
|
Filing 11
Text Only ORDER GRANTING Amended APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Jeremy M. White to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. #10 by Judge John W. Holcomb. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cla) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 10 Amended APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Jeremy M. White to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500.00 Previously Paid on 11/6/2023, Receipt No. 36357025) filed by Defendant Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Rodriguez, Maria) |
| Filing 9 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Jeremy M. White to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500.00 Previously Paid on 11/6/2023, Receipt No. 36357025) filed by Defendant Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Rodriguez, Maria) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Jeremy M. White to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-36357025) #5 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local counsel failed to sign the application. See LR 11-1. Proposed Order has not been flattened and is causing a corruption with the filing. (lt) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth to Judge John W. Holcomb for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 8:23-cv-02037 JWH(DFMx). (rn) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Rodriguez, Maria) |
| Filing 5 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Jeremy M. White to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-36357025) filed by Defendant Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Rodriguez, Maria) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (sh) |
| CONFORMED EFILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. [FILED IN STATE COURT 10/06/2022 SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 2 EXHIBIT B TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ](sh) |
| CONFORMED EFILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc., filed by Plaintiff Susanne K Hopper.[FILED IN STATE COURT 08/09/2022 SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 1 EXHIBIT A TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ] (sh) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc.. (Rodriguez, Maria) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc., identifying Defendant is an indirect subsidiary of The Walt Disney Company. (Rodriguez, Maria) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of Orange County, case number 30-2022-01274567-CU-PO-CJC Receipt No: CCACDC-36326298 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-E, #2 Exhibit F - Part 1 of 2, #3 Exhibit F - Part 2 of 2, #4 Proof of Service) (Attorney Maria C. Rodriguez added to party Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc.(pty:dft))(Rodriguez, Maria) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
