Jose Perales v. 6th/Vermont RX Associates LLC et al
| Jose Perales |
| 6th/Vermont RX Associates LLC, Essex Property Trust Inc and DOES 1-10 |
| 8:2023cv02051 |
| November 1, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| Civil Rights: Accommodations |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick, Based on the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS ORDERED THAT: Plaintiff Jose Perales and Defendants 6 Vermont RX Associates, LLC and Essex Property Trust, Inc.'s request to Continue the Rule 26(f) Scheduling Conference is GRANTED #11 . The Scheduling Conference is now set for January 23, 2024, at 9:30 am. (es)
|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION to Continue Scheduling Conference from January 16, 2024 to January 23, 2024 Re: Order,, Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings, #10 filed by Plaintiff Jose Perales. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Cooper, Cody) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER SETTING RULE 26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE FOR JANUARY 16, 2024, at 9:30 am by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. The parties shall meet no later than (21) days before the schedulingconference. The Joint Rule 26(f) Report shall be filed no later than fourteen(14) days before the scheduling conference. (et)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before the Magistrate Judge, this case remains assigned to Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick for final disposition re: Consent to Proceed (CV-11C) before US Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program Non-Final #7 ; Consent to Proceed (CV-11C) before US Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program Non-Final #8 (rn) |
| Filing 8 STATEMENT Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge filed by Plaintiff Jose Perales (Cooper, Cody) |
| Filing 7 STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Defendants 6th/Vermont RX Associates LLC, Essex Property Trust Inc. (Kitay, Theresa) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant 6th/Vermont RX Associates LLC.(Kitay, Theresa) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Essex Property Trust Inc.(Kitay, Theresa) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (Attachments: #1 CV11C) (jtil) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Jose Perales in Orange County Superior Court on 9/12/2023, attached as Exhibit 2. (jtil) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant 6th/Vermont RX Associates LLC, Essex Property Trust Inc, (Kitay, Theresa) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants 6th/Vermont RX Associates LLC, Essex Property Trust Inc. (Kitay, Theresa) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of Orange County, case number 30-2023-01349593-CU-CR-NJC Receipt No: ACACDC-36334293 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Essex Property Trust Inc, 6th/Vermont RX Associates LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Summons, #2 Exhibit 2-Complaint, #3 Exhibit 3-Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Exhibit 4-Notice of Hearing, #5 Exhibit 5-Receipt) (Attorney Theresa Lynne Kitay added to party 6th/Vermont RX Associates LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Theresa Lynne Kitay added to party Essex Property Trust Inc(pty:dft))(Kitay, Theresa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
