Cameron N. Verdi v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation et al
| Cameron N. Verdi |
| Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Joseph Depaolo, Stephen Wyremski, Eric Howell and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 8:2023cv02131 |
| November 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| Karen E Scott |
| James V Selna |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 REPLY Memorandum of Points and Authorities in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #11 filed by Defendant Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. (Delbick, Michael) |
| Filing 17 OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #11 filed by Plaintiff Cameron N. Verdi. (Attachments: #1 Declaration VERDI DECL, #2 Exhibit INDEX OF EXHIBITS, #3 Exhibit EX. A, #4 Exhibit EX. B, #5 Exhibit EX. C, #6 Exhibit EX. D, #7 Exhibit EX. E)(Verdi, Cameron) |
Filing 16
Text Only ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Ryan A. Kane to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of defendant #15 by Judge James V. Selna. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (eva) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 15 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Ryan A. Kane to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500.00 Previously Paid on 12/21/2023, Receipt No. 166894) filed by Defendant Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order On Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear Pro Hac Vice) (Delbick, Michael) |
| Filing 14 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN FILED DOCUMENT RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #11 by Judge James V. Selna. A notice of interested parties shall be filed no later than 5 days from entry of this Order. (es) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7-1.1 no notice of interested parties. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (es) |
|
Filing 12
Order Setting Rule 26(f) Scheduling Conference for 02/12/2024 at 10:30 a.m. before Judge James V. Selna. Counsel shall file the Joint Rule 26 Meeting Report, with the completed Exhibit A, by 02/02/2024. (eva)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Motion set for hearing on 1/29/2024 at 01:30 PM before Judge James V. Selna. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Points and Authorities in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #2 Declaration Donald G. Grieser, #3 Exhibit A - Appointment of Receiver, #4 Exhibit B - Draft Complaint, #5 Exhibit C - Correspondence, #6 Proposed Order Granting Motion to Dismiss) (Attorney Michael H. Delbick added to party Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation(pty:dft)) (Delbick, Michael) |
| Filing 10 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA. (eva) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT to this Court's General Order in the Matter of Assignment of Cases and Duties to the District Judges. Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 8:23-cv-01206 JVS(KESx). Case transferred from Judge David O. Carter to Judge James V. Selna for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 8:23-cv-02131 JVS(KESx). Signed by Judge James V. Selna (rn)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION FOR ELECTRONIC FILING by Judge David O. Carter: granting #4 APPLICATION for Pro Se Electronic Filing. The applicant must register to use the Courts CM/ECF System within five (5) days of being served with this order. Registration information is available at the Pro Se Litigant E-Filing web page located on the Courts website. Upon registering, the applicant will receive a CM/ECF login and password that will allow him/her to file non-sealed documents electronically in this case only. Any documents being submitted under seal must be manually filed with the Clerk. (rolm)
|
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION for Pro Se Litigant to electronically file documents in a specific case filed by Plaintiff Cameron N. Verdi. (Attachments: #1 Lodged Proposed Order) (jtil) |
| Filing 3 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendants Joseph Depaolo, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Eric Howell and Stephen Wyremski. (jtil) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Cameron N. Verdi. (jtil) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Cameron N. Verdi against Defendants Joseph Depaolo, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Eric Howell, Stephen Wyremski. Case assigned to Judge David O. Carter for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (Filing fee $ 402 Paid.) Jury Demand. (Attachments: #1 CV71) (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
