Savannah Paras v. Experian Information Solutions Inc
| Savannah Paras |
| Experian Information Solutions Inc |
| 8:2023cv02140 |
| November 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John W Holcomb |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 STATUS REPORT Joint filed by Plaintiff Savannah Paras. (Taylor, Alexander) |
Filing 13
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John W. Holcomb. Scheduling Conference set for 1/26/2024 at 11:00 AM before Judge John W. Holcomb. (cla)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Experian Information Solutions Inc, identifying Experian plc. (Pritchett, Alexandria) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Experian Information Solutions Inc.(Attorney Alexandria Pritchett added to party Experian Information Solutions Inc(pty:dft))(Pritchett, Alexandria) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Savannah Paras, upon Defendant Experian Information Solutions Inc served on 11/22/2023, answer due 12/13/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Diana Ruiz - Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service (Taylor, Alexander) |
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb. (cla)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Experian Information Solutions Inc. (lh) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John W. Holcomb and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (lh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Savannah Paras. (Taylor, Alexander) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Savannah Paras, (Taylor, Alexander) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Savannah Paras. (Taylor, Alexander) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36418123 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Savannah Paras. (Attorney Alexander James Adducci Taylor added to party Savannah Paras(pty:pla))(Taylor, Alexander) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Savannah Paras v. Experian Information Solutions Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Savannah Paras | |
| Represented By: | Alexander James Adducci Taylor |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Experian Information Solutions Inc | |
| Represented By: | Alexandria Pritchett |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
