United States of America v. 76,281.21 Seized from One Pacific Premier Bank Account
| United States of America |
| 76,281.21 Seized from One Pacific Premier Bank Account |
| 8:2023cv02280 |
| December 4, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Cormac J Carney |
| John D Early |
| Karen E Scott |
| Forfeit/Penalty: Other |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 0981 Civil Forfeiture |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT Executed by Plaintiff United States of America, by Publication upon Defendant All Defendants. Publication was made in the official government website: www.forfeiture.gov for 30 consecutive days. (Dochterman, James) |
| Filing 8 PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN (USM-285) of Complaint/warrant (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 upon 76,281.21 Seized from One Pacific Premier Bank Account served on 12/6/2023, answer due 1/5/2024, served by - service, by Federal statute, upon -. Remarks: Seized $76,281.21 (23-FBI-000667) as 8:23-CV-02280 on 12/6/23. (twdb) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott to Judge Cormac J. Carney for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge John D. Early. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 8:23-cv-02280-CJC (JDEx). (et) |
| Filing 5 WARRANT for seizure of $76,281.21 Seized from One Pacific Premier Bank Account issued on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (lh) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Warrant for Seizure on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Dochterman, James) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Dochterman, James) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT No Fee Required - US Government, filed by plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Attorney James Edmund Dochterman added to party UNITED STATES OF AMERICA(pty:pla))(Dochterman, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: United States of America v. 76,281.21 Seized from One Pacific Premier Bank Account | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | James Edmund Dochterman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: 76,281.21 Seized from One Pacific Premier Bank Account | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
