Douglas Anhdung Tran v. Paul Revere Life Insurance Company et al
| Douglas Anhdung Tran |
| Paul Revere Life Insurance Company, Colonial Voluntary Benefits, UNUM Insurance Company, Does 1 to 100 and UNUM Insurance Co. |
| 8:2023cv02342 |
| December 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John D Early |
| Fred W Slaughter |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER ON PRETRIAL AND TRIAL PROCEDURES (CIVIL CASES) by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. (mku)
|
|
Filing 12
MINUTES SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter: The Court, having reviewed the pleadings and the parties' submissions pursuant to FRCP 26(f), VACATES the Scheduling Conference set for 2/15/2024, and sets the following schedule: Jury Trial set for 2/11/2025 at 8:30 AM. Final Pretrial Conference and Hearing on Motions in Limine set for 1.23/2025 at 8:30 AM. Last Date to Hear Motion to Amend Pleadings/Add Parties: 3/28/2024. Non-Expert Discovery Cut-Off: 7/25/2024. Last Date to Hear Motions: 10/31/2024. Deadline to Complete Settlement Conference: 11/14/2024. Motions in Limine with Proposed Orders: 1/2/2025. Joint Proposed Final Pretrial Conference Order: 1/9/2025. (See document for further information). (jp)
|
| Filing 11 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 4 days, filed by Defendants Paul Revere Life Insurance Company, UNUM Insurance Co... (Maguire, Daniel) |
|
Filing 10
CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. (mku)
|
|
Filing 9
**PARTIES SHALL DISREGARD THIS ENTRY AND REFER TO CORRECT CIVIL STANDING ORDER AT DKT. #10 **CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. (mku) Modified on 12/18/2023 (mku).
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER SETTING RULE 26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. Scheduling Conference set for 2/15/2024 at 9:00 a.m. See Order for details. (mku)
|
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendants Paul Revere Life Insurance Company, UNUM Insurance Co..(Maguire, Daniel) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fred W. Slaughter and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (jtil) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Douglas Anhdung Tran in Orange County Superior Court on 6/23/2023, attached as Exhibit 1. (jtil) |
| Filing 3 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Paul Revere Life Insurance Company, UNUM Insurance Company, identifying Douglas Anhdung Tran, The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company, Unum Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Maguire, Daniel) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Paul Revere Life Insurance Company, UNUM Insurance Company. (Maguire, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2023-0133216 Receipt No: ACACDC-36558167 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendants UNUM Insurance Company, Paul Revere Life Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Proof of Service) (Attorney Daniel W Maguire added to party Paul Revere Life Insurance Company(pty:dft), Attorney Daniel W Maguire added to party UNUM Insurance Company(pty:dft))(Maguire, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
