Danielle Stout v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Danielle Stout |
Experian Information Solutions, Inc. |
8:2023cv02359 |
December 13, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John D Early |
Fred W Slaughter |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (jp) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Interested Parties (Martin, George) |
Filing 9 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Danielle Stout. (Martin, George) |
Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Danielle Stout. (Martin, George) |
Filing 7 ORDER IN RESPONSE TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ATTORNEY CASE OPENING by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. In accordance with the Notice to Filer of Deficiencies in Electronically Filed Documents, counsel for Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to consult the Notice to Filer of Deficiencies #5 and file a Civil Cover Sheet no later than 5 days from entry of this Order. Failure to do so may result in sanctions and/or the action being DISMISSED. See Local Rules 3-1 and 83-7. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (mku) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 6 CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. (mku) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: The Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71)is missing or incomplete. All civil actions presented for filing must be accompanied by a completed Civil Cover Sheet. See Local Rule 3-1. Counsel must file a completed Civil Cover Sheet immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (lh) |
Filing 4 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fred W. Slaughter and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (lh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36569226 - Fee: $405. (Attorney George Thomas Martin, III added to party Danielle Stout(pty:pla))(Martin, George) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Danielle Stout v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Danielle Stout | |
Represented By: | George Thomas Martin, III |
Represented By: | Nicholas J Bontrager |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.