Dhaman Gill v. 23andMe, Inc.
| Dhaman Gill |
| 23andMe, Inc. |
| 8:2023cv02387 |
| December 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| Fred W Slaughter |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 STATUS REPORT Regarding Status of Defendant 23andMe, Inc.'s Motion for Transfer and Consolidation of Litigation Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407 filed by Defendant 23andMe, Inc.. (Guyon, Rebekah) |
Filing 13
ORDER Re Stipulation to stay Proceedings Pending Transfer by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation #11 by Judge Fred W. Slaughter, the court ORDERS the following: (1) All proceedings and all pretrial deadlines in the above-captioned case are STAYED UNTIL FURTHER ORDER OF THE COURT. See document for further information. (3) The Parties shall file a joint status report every thirty (30) days regarding the status of the case and the status of Defendant's Motion to Transfer, with the first joint status report due to the court on 2/8/2024. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
|
| Filing 12 Notice of Filing of MDL Motion filed by Defendant 23andMe, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Proof of Service)(Ballon, Ian) |
| Filing 11 STIPULATION to Stay Case pending Transfer by the Judicial Panel on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION filed by Defendant 23andMe, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Rebekah S. Guyon ISO Stipulation to Stay Proceedings, #2 Proposed Order Proposed Order ISO Stipulation to Stay Proceedings Pending MDL Transfer, #3 Proof of Service)(Ballon, Ian) |
|
Filing 10
CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. (mku)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Kevin Laukaitis. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (lh) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fred W. Slaughter and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Southern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Fred W. Slaughter for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Douglas F. McCormick. New Case Number 8:23-cv-02387 FWS (DFMx). (lh) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 filed by Defendant 23andMe, Inc. identifying 23andMe Holding Co. as Corporate Parent. (Guyon, Rebekah) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Pendency of Other Actions or Proceedings filed by Defendant 23andMe, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Guyon, Rebekah) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant 23andMe, Inc.. (Guyon, Rebekah) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 37-2023-00012709-CU-MT-CTL Receipt No: ACACDC-36584589 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendant 23andMe, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Docket Report and Other Docs, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Rebekah S. Guyon added to party 23andMe, Inc.(pty:dft))(Guyon, Rebekah) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT against Defendant 23andMe, Inc. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Dhaman Gill. (FILED IN ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 10/25/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dhaman Gill v. 23andMe, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Dhaman Gill | |
| Represented By: | Michael R Reese |
| Represented By: | George Volney Granade |
| Represented By: | Kevin Laukaitis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: 23andMe, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Rebekah S. Guyon |
| Represented By: | Ian C Ballon |
| Represented By: | Kristin Louise O'Carroll |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
