Mina Kim v. Alejandro N. Mayorkas et al
Mina Kim |
Department of Homeland Security, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, Immigrant Investor Program Office, USCIS California Service Center, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Alissa Emmel and Tracy Tarango |
8:2023cv02392 |
December 18, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John W Holcomb |
Douglas F McCormick |
Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 STANDING ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb. (cla) |
Filing 4 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John W. Holcomb and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (jtil) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid ($405 paid on 12/18/2023, receipt number 36593150), filed by Plaintiff Mina Kim.(Cho, Jamie) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36593150 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff Mina Kim. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K) (Attorney Jamie Jimin Cho added to party Mina Kim(pty:pla))(Cho, Jamie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.