Richard Lee Austin, Jr. v. Edward Borla
Richard Lee Austin and Richard Lee Austin, Jr. |
Edward Borla |
8:2023cv02455 |
December 25, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
Charles F Eick |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick granting #10 REQUEST for Enlargement of Time to File Answer. The time within which to file an Answer to the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is enlarged until March 27, 2024. (vmun) |
Filing 10 Second REQUEST for Enlargement of Time to File Answer filed by Respondent Edward Borla. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Kuchar, Elizabeth) |
Filing 9 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick granting #8 REQUEST for Extension of Time to Answer. The time within which to file an Answer to the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is enlarged until February 26, 2024. (vmun) |
Filing 8 First REQUEST to Extend Time to File Answer to 2/26/2024 filed by Respondent Edward Borla. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order on Request for Enlargement of Time to File Answer) (Kuchar, Elizabeth) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Elizabeth Manalastas Kuchar on behalf of Respondent Edward Borla (Attorney Elizabeth Manalastas Kuchar added to party Edward Borla(pty:res))(Kuchar, Elizabeth) |
Filing 6 ORDER REQUIRING ANSWER TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent file an Answer to thePetition within twenty-three (23) days of the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if Petitioner desires to file a Reply to the Answer, Petitioner shall do so within fifteen (15) days of the date that the Answer is filed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent shall give timely notice of any court proceeding to any person who is a "crime victim" within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. section 3771. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Non Consent, #2 Petition, #3 Memorandum of Ps and As) (ch) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM of Points and Authorities in Support filed by petitioner Richard Lee Austin, Jr. Re: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #1 (Schraer, George) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha and referred to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (car) |
Filing 3 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge Declined, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636c filed by petitioner Richard Lee Austin. The petitioner does not consent. (Schraer, George) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Movant Richard Lee Austin. (Schraer, George) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (28 USC 2254), Receipt No. ACACDC-36625589 for $5 filing fee, filed by petitioner Richard Lee Austin. (Attorney George L Schraer added to party Richard Lee Austin(pty:bkmov))(Schraer, George) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.