Santos Ovalle v. County of Orange et al
Plaintiff: Santos Ovalle
Defendant: County of Orange, a public entity, Orange County Sheriff Department and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Case Number: 8:2023cv02489
Filed: December 29, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Mark C Scarsi
Referring Judge: Karen E Scott
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 23, 2024 Filing 15 SUPPLEMENT to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case DEFENDANT COUNTY OF ORANGE AND ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT #11 DEFENDANT COUNTY OF ORANGE AND ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENTS SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS filed by Defendants County of Orange, a public entity, Orange County Sheriff Department. (Witt, Julia)
February 6, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER Granting Plaintiff's Extension Request (Dkt. 13) and Inviting Supplemental Briefing from Defendants by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott: Plaintiff's extension request is GRANTED. Plaintiffs new opposition due date is March 15, 2024. The Court directs the Clerk to mail this order to Mr. Eady at 600 W. Santa Ana Blvd., Ste 1130, Santa Ana, CA 92701-4557. Defendants' supplemental brief should be filed by February 23, 2024. Granting #13 REQUEST for Extension of Time. [SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION.] (es)
January 29, 2024 Filing 13 REQUEST for Extension of Time to Seek Council filed by Plaintiff Santos Ovalle. (es)
January 11, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS): Scheduling Order Re Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 11) by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott: re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #11 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The hearing noticed for February 6, 2024 is hereby ordered off calendar. 2. On or before February 9, 2024, Plaintiff shall either: a. file a legal brief opposing the motion to dismiss; or b. file a First Amended Complaint that attempts to addresses the issues raised by Defendants' motion to dismiss. 3. Defendants shall file a reply on or before either (a) February 23, 2024, or (b) fourteen days after Plaintiff's opposition is docketed, whichever comes later. [SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION.] (es)
January 5, 2024 Filing 11 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case DEFENDANT COUNTY OF ORANGE AND ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT filed by Defendants County of Orange, a public entity, Orange County Sheriff Department. Motion set for hearing on 2/6/2024 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Julia M. Witt in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, #2 Proposed Order Proposed Order in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss) (Witt, Julia)
January 5, 2024 Filing 10 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error: Initial Standing Order for Civil Cases Assigned to Judge Mark C. Scarsi #8 and Text Only Entry re Notice to Pro Se Litigants 9 . Documents incorrectly docketed in this case. This 194 pro se civil rights case is initially handled by the Magistrate Judge and not the District Judge. (lc) Modified on 1/5/2024 (lc).
January 5, 2024 Filing 9 ( DOCKETED IN ERROR-SEE CLERICAL ERROR DOCKET NO. 10) .TEXT ONLY (IN CHAMBERS) NOTICE TO PRO SE LITIGANTS by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: Although Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, i.e., without legal representation, she/he nonetheless is required to comply with Court orders, the Local Rules, and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See C.D. Cal. L.R. 83-2.2.3. The Local Rules are available on the Court's website, http://www.cacd.uscourts.gov/court-procedures/ local-rules. The Court cannot provide legal advice to any party, including pro se litigants, i.e., parties who are not represented by a lawyer. There is a free "Pro Se Clinic" that can provide information and guidance about many aspects of civil litigation in this Court. The Court notes that a party to this lawsuit does not have a lawyer. Parties in court without a lawyer are called "pro se litigants." These parties often face special challenges in federal court. Public Counsel runs a free Federal Pro Se Clinic where pro se litigants can get information and guidance. The Clinic is located at the Roybal Federal Building and Courthouse, 255 East Temple Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012 (note that the clinic may not be open for in-person appointments during the pandemic). Pro se litigants must call or submit an on-line application to request services as follows: on-line applications can be submitted at http://prose.cacd.uscourts.gov/los-angeles, or call (213) 385-2977, ext. 270. Pro se litigants may submit documents for filing through the Court's Electronic Document Submission System (EDSS) instead of mailing or bringing documents to the Clerk's Office. Only internet access and an e-mail address are required. Documents are submitted in PDF format through an online portal on the Court's website. To access EDSS and for additional information, visit the Court's website at https://apps.cacd.uscourts.gov/edss. Attorneys may not use EDSS to submit documents on behalf of their clients. Attorneys are required by the local rules to file documents electronically using the Court's CM/ECF System. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (smo) Modified on 1/5/2024 (lc).
January 5, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ( DOCKETED IN ERROR-SEE CLERICAL ERROR DOCKET NO. 10) . INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MARK C. SCARSI upon filing of the complaint by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo) Modified on 1/5/2024 (lc).
January 4, 2024 Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (lh)
December 29, 2023 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed against DefendantsCounty of Orange, a public entity, Does, Orange County Sheriff Department pursuant to 42:1983, filed by Plaintiff Santos Ovalle. (FILED IN ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 10/27/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh)
December 29, 2023 Filing 6 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney S Frank Harrell counsel for Defendants County of Orange, a public entity, Orange County Sheriff Department. Adding JULIA M. WITT as counsel of record for DEFENDANTS for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by DEFENDANTS COUNTY OF ORANGE & ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT. (Harrell, S)
December 29, 2023 Filing 5 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney S Frank Harrell counsel for Defendants County of Orange, a public entity, Orange County Sheriff Department. Adding S. FRANK HARRELL as counsel of record for DEFENDANTS for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by DEFENDANTS COUNTY OF ORANGE & ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT. (Attorney S Frank Harrell added to party County of Orange, a public entity(pty:dft), Attorney S Frank Harrell added to party Orange County Sheriff Department(pty:dft))(Harrell, S)
December 29, 2023 Filing 4 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by DEFENDANTS County of Orange, a public entity, Orange County Sheriff Department, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF NOTICE TO ADVERSE PARTIES OF REMOVAL TO FEDERAL COURT served on 12-29-2023. (Cox, Jesse)
December 29, 2023 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by DEFENDANTS County of Orange, a public entity, Orange County Sheriff Department, (Cox, Jesse)
December 29, 2023 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants County of Orange, a public entity, Orange County Sheriff Department. (Cox, Jesse)
December 29, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2023-01357265 Receipt No: ACACDC-36647198 - Fee: $405, filed by DEFENDANTS Orange County Sheriff Department, County of Orange, a public entity. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits A-J to Notice of Removal) (Attorney Jesse Keenon Cox added to party County of Orange, a public entity(pty:dft), Attorney Jesse Keenon Cox added to party Orange County Sheriff Department(pty:dft))(Cox, Jesse)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Santos Ovalle v. County of Orange et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Santos Ovalle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: County of Orange, a public entity
Represented By: S Frank Harrell
Represented By: Jesse Keenon Cox
Represented By: Julia M. Witt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Orange County Sheriff Department
Represented By: S Frank Harrell
Represented By: Jesse Keenon Cox
Represented By: Julia M. Witt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?