Ronald Anthony Dilisi et al v. General Motors LLC et al
Ronald Anthony Dilisi and Cindy Villavicencio |
General Motors LLC and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
8:2024cv00007 |
January 2, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Fred W Slaughter |
Autumn D Spaeth |
Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Orange County Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Orange County Superior Court - West Justice Center at Santa Ana. Case number: 30-2023-01364374-CU-BC-CJC. (jp) |
Filing 16 ORDER Re Stipulation of Maximum Damages Limit and to REMAND Removed Action #5 by Judge Fred W. Slaughter, the court GRANTS the Stipulation and ORDERS the following: The above-captioned case is REMANDED to the Orange County Superior Court, State of California, Case No. 30-2023-01364374-CU-BC-CJC. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp) |
Filing 15 STIPULATION to Remand Case to State Court filed by Defendant General Motors LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Remanding Case to State Court)(Park, Steven) |
Filing 14 MINUTES ORDER GRANTING Unopposed Motion to Dismiss #9 by Judge Fred W. Slaughter: the court GRANTS Plaintiffs leave to amend the Complaint. Plaintiffs are ORDERED and DIRECTED to file an amended complaint within twenty-one (21) days of this Order. Failure to file an amended complaint on or before the deadline set by the court will result in the dismissal of this action with prejudice without further notice for failure to prosecute and/or comply with a court order. (jp) |
Filing 13 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge Fred W. Slaughter: Before the court is Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Fourth and Fifth Causes of Action #9 . The court finds this matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); C.D. Cal. R. 7-15. Accordingly, the hearing set for February 8, 2024, at 10:00 a.m. is VACATED/OFF CALENDAR and the court takes the matter UNDER SUBMISSION. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (mku) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 12 NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss the Fourth and Fifth Causes of Action of Plaintiffs' Complaint ; Memorandum of Points and Authorities #9 filed by Defendant General Motors LLC. (Park, Steven) |
Filing 11 ORDER SETTING RULE 26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. Scheduling Conference set for 2/29/2024 at 9:00 a.m. See Order for details. (mku) |
Filing 10 CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. (mku) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss the Fourth and Fifth Causes of Action of Plaintiffs' Complaint ; Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed by Defendant General Motors LLC. Motion set for hearing on 2/8/2024 at 10:00 AM before Judge Fred W. Slaughter. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Steven D. Park in Support of Defendant General Motors LLC's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint for Failure to State a Claim, #2 Proposed Order Granting Defendant General Motors, LLC's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint, #3 Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Defendant General Motors LLC's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint for Failure to State a Claim, #4 Proposed Order Granting Defendant General Motors LLC's Request for Judicial Notice) (Park, Steven) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant General Motors LLC, re Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Complaint - (Discovery), Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #6 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #5 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #4 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 , Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form #7 served on January 5, 2024. (Park, Steven) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fred W. Slaughter and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (sh) |
CONFORMED EFILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, General Motors LLC., filed by Plaintiffs Ronald Anthony Dilisi, Cindy Villavicencio.[FILED IN STATE COURT 11/22/2023 SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 1 EXHIBIT A TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ] (sh) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant General Motors LLC identifying General Motors Company as Corporate Parent. (Park, Steven) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant General Motors LLC, (Park, Steven) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant General Motors LLC. (Park, Steven) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2023-01364374-CU-BC-CJC Receipt No: ACACDC-36654661 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendant General Motors LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit B to Notice of Removal, #3 Declaration of Eric Mitchell in Support of Notice of Removal of Entire Case, #4 Exhibit A to Declaration of Eric Mitchell, #5 Exhibit B to Declaration of Eric Mitchell, #6 Exhibit C to Declaration of Eric Mitchell) (Attorney Steven D Park added to party General Motors LLC(pty:dft))(Park, Steven) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.