Deepa Patel et al v. City of Stanton et al
Deepa Patel, California Hospitality LLC and California One Hospitality LLC |
City of Stanton, a municipal corporation, DOES 1-10 Inclusive and City of Stanton |
8:2024cv00014 |
January 2, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Douglas F McCormick |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C Statement of Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge) (ghap) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs California Hospitality LLC, Deepa Patel, identifying Plaintiff Deepa Patel, Plaintiff California One Hospitality LLC, Defendant City of Stanton, a municipal corporation. (Weiser, Frank) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs California Hospitality LLC, Deepa Patel. (Weiser, Frank) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36658139 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiffs Deepa Patel, California Hospitality LLC. (Attorney Frank A Weiser added to party California Hospitality LLC(pty:pla), Attorney Frank A Weiser added to party Deepa Patel(pty:pla))(Weiser, Frank) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.