Danielle Kelley v. Happy Money, Inc. et al
| Danielle Kelley |
| Happy Money, Inc., Payoff, Inc., Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC |
| 8:2024cv00069 |
| January 12, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| Karen E Scott |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Danielle Kelley. upon Happy Money, Inc. waiver sent by Plaintiff on 2/29/2024, answer due 4/29/2024. Waiver of Service signed by Wendy Qiu, Esq.. (Apps, Stanley) |
| Filing 14 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, identifying Equifax Inc.. (Quinn, Thomas) |
| Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC answer now due 3/14/2024, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC.(Attorney Thomas P Quinn, Jr added to party EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC(pty:dft))(Quinn, Thomas) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Danielle Kelley, upon Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. served on 1/25/2024, answer due 2/15/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity (Apps, Stanley) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Danielle Kelley, upon Defendant Happy Money, Inc. served on 1/25/2024, answer due 2/15/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity (Apps, Stanley) |
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (twdb) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Happy Money, Inc. (twdb) |
| Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Danielle Kelley. (Attachments: #1 proposed Summons on Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc.)(Apps, Stanley) |
| Filing 7 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER. (kdu) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (lh) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Danielle Kelley, identifying Law Offices of Robert S. Gitmeid, P.C.; Law Offices of Robert S. Gitmeid & Assoc., PLLC. (Apps, Stanley) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Danielle Kelley. (Apps, Stanley) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36718092 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff Danielle Kelley. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E) (Attorney Stanley Robert Apps added to party Danielle Kelley(pty:pla))(Apps, Stanley) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
