Jose Mario Landaverde v. CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc. et al
| Jose Mario Landaverde |
| CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc., Carmax Funding Services, LLC, Carmax Funding Services II, LLC and Does 1 through 100, inclusive |
| 8:2024cv00071 |
| January 11, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Monica Ramirez Almadani |
| Cormac J Carney |
| Karen E Scott |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 REPORT of Joint Rule 26(f) Report filed by Plaintiff Jose Mario Landaverde. (Mohseni, Farzan) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Change of address by Farzan Bijan Amir Mohseni attorney for Plaintiff Jose Mario Landaverde. Changing attorneys address to 1460 Westwood Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90024. Filed by Plaintiff Jose Mario Landaverde. (Mohseni, Farzan) |
Filing 15
REASSIGNMENT ORDER by Judge Monica Ramirez Almadani. See Order for details. (gga)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER OF THE CHIEF JUDGE (#24-022) approved by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Pursuant to the recommended procedure adopted by the Court for the CREATION OF CALENDAR of Judge Monica Ramirez Almadani, this case is transferred from Judge Cormac J. Carney to the calendar of Monica Ramirez Almadani for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 8:24-cv-00071-MRA (KESx). (rrp) Modified on 2/26/2024 (rrp).
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF INTENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney. Scheduling order to be issued on March 14, 2024. (rrp) |
| Filing 12 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (lh) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Southern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Cormac J. Carney for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Karen E. Scott. New Case Number 8:24-cv-00071 CJC (KESx). (lh) |
| NON-CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint, filed by Defendants CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc., Carmax Funding Services II, LLC, Carmax Funding Services, LLC. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO DECLARATION #7 )(lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT against Defendants CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc., Carmax Funding Services II, LLC, Carmax Funding Services, LLC, Does. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Jose Mario Landaverde. (FILED IN ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 11/13/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO DECLARATION #7 ) (lh) |
| Filing 8 EXHIBIT Filed filed by Defendants CARMAX FUNDING SERVICE II, LLC, CARMAX FUNDING SERVICE, LLC, CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc.. as to Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Plaintiff's Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Proof of Service, #3 Exhibit C - Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint, #4 Exhibit D - True and correct copies of all process, pleadings, and orders provided to Defendant)(Rojas, Daniel) |
| Filing 7 DECLARATION of Daniel Rojas re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by Defendants CARMAX FUNDING SERVICE II, LLC, CARMAX FUNDING SERVICE, LLC, CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Plaintiff's Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Proof of Service, #3 Exhibit C - Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint, #4 Exhibit D - True and correct copies of all process, pleadings, and orders provided to Defendant)(Rojas, Daniel) |
| Filing 6 DECLARATION of Ashley Cullum re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by Defendants CARMAX FUNDING SERVICE II, LLC, CARMAX FUNDING SERVICE, LLC, CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc.. (Rojas, Daniel) |
| Filing 5 DECLARATION of ARIEL KUMPINSKY re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by Defendants CARMAX FUNDING SERVICE II, LLC, CARMAX FUNDING SERVICE, LLC, CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - CV, #2 Exhibit B - List of Reviewed Materials)(Rojas, Daniel) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendants CARMAX FUNDING SERVICE II, LLC, CARMAX FUNDING SERVICE, LLC, CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc.. (Rojas, Daniel) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants CARMAX FUNDING SERVICE II, LLC, CARMAX FUNDING SERVICE, LLC, CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc., identifying Plaintiff Jose Mario Landaverde, Defendant CarMax Auto, Defendant CarMax Funding I, Defendant CarMax Funding II, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C., Bibiyan Law Group, P.C.. (Rojas, Daniel) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants CARMAX FUNDING SERVICE II, LLC, CARMAX FUNDING SERVICE, LLC, CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc.. (Rojas, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2023-01362649-CU-OE-CXC Receipt No: ACACDC-36714162 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendant CARMAX FUNDING SERVICE II, LLC, CARMAX FUNDING SERVICE, LLC, CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc.. (Attorney Daniel N. Rojas added to party CARMAX FUNDING SERVICE II, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Daniel N. Rojas added to party CARMAX FUNDING SERVICE, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Daniel N. Rojas added to party CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc.(pty:dft))(Rojas, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
