Breanna Patricia Betourne v. Martin O'Malley
Breanna Patricia Betourne |
Martin O'Malley |
8:2024cv00090 |
January 16, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Percy Anderson |
Steve Kim |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim for all further proceedings. Please use the case number 8:24-cv-00090-SK on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. RE: Consent to Proceed before U S Magistrate Judge (AUSA filers only) - Non-Final #9 , Consent to Proceed before U S Magistrate Judge (non-AUSA) - Non-Final #7 . THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (aco) |
Filing 9 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Martin O'Malley. (Attorney Jennifer Lee Tarn added to party Martin O'Malley(pty:dft))(Tarn, Jennifer) |
Filing 7 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff Breanna Patricia Betourne. (Rosales, Steven) |
Filing 8 ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (NON-PRISONER CASE) by Judge Percy Anderson. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: The Request is GRANTED.; granting #2 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (aco) |
Filing 6 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (see document for details) (Attachments: #1 Blank Consent Form) (hr) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and referred to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (sh) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Breanna Patricia Betourne, (Rosales, Steven) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Breanna Patricia Betourne. (Rosales, Steven) |
Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Breanna Patricia Betourne. (Rosales, Steven) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Breanna Patricia Betourne. (Attorney Steven G. Rosales added to party Breanna Patricia Betourne(pty:pla))(Rosales, Steven) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Breanna Patricia Betourne v. Martin O'Malley | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Breanna Patricia Betourne | |
Represented By: | Steven G. Rosales |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Martin O'Malley | |
Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA |
Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney SA-CV |
Represented By: | Jennifer Lee Tarn |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.