Dallas Engler et al v. Amazon.com Services LLC et al
| Amazon.com Services LLC and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| Dallas Engler, Lucky Agustin and AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC; |
| 8:2024cv00155 |
| January 22, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Cormac J Carney |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 23
ORDER RE TRANSFER to this Court's General Order in the Matter of Assignment of Cases and Duties to the District Judges. (Related Case) filed. Transfer of case declined by Judge James V. Selna, for the reasons set forth on this order. Related Case No. 5:18-cv-00024 JVS(SHKx) (rn)
|
| Filing 22 NOTICE OF INTENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney. Scheduling order to be issued on July 11, 2024. (rrp) |
| Filing 21 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint in Part and/or Stay the Case #20 filed by Defendant Amazon.com Services LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Proposed Order)(Hamburger, Bradley) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint in Part and/or Stay the Case filed by Defendant Amazon.com Services LLC. Motion set for hearing on 6/3/2024 at 01:30 PM before Judge Cormac J. Carney. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Megan Cooney in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #2 Exhibit A to Declaration of Megan Cooney, #3 Proposed Order) (Hamburger, Bradley) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronic Filed Document RE: Notice of Appearance #18 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel G123.. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Andrew Michael Kasabian on behalf of Defendant Amazon.com Services LLC (Attorney Andrew Michael Kasabian added to party Amazon.com Services LLC(pty:dft))(Kasabian, Andrew) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Amazon.com Services LLC. (Cooney, Megan) |
| Filing 16 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Amazon.com Services LLC identifying Amazon.com, Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Cooney, Megan) |
| Filing 15 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Amazon.com Services LLC, (Cooney, Megan) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER by Judge Cormac J. Carney, Granting Joint Stipulation to Set Briefing Schedule Regarding Defendant's Response to the Complaint #13 . In the event that Defendant files the Motion, Plaintiffs shall have until April 22, 2024 to respond to the Motion; and Defendant shall have until May 13, 2024 to file a reply in support of the Motion. SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. (twdb)
|
| Filing 13 Joint STIPULATION for Order to Set Briefing Schedule Regarding Defendant's Response to the Complaint filed by Defendant Amazon.com Services LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Cooney, Megan) |
| Filing 12 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Amazon.com Services LLC answer now due 3/15/2024, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Amazon.com Services LLC.(Attorney Megan M Cooney added to party Amazon.com Services LLC(pty:dft))(Cooney, Megan) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Dallas Engler, Lucky Agustin, upon Defendant Amazon.com Services LLC served on 1/25/2024, answer due 2/15/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent Rebecca Vang in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity (Beligan, Leah) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Lucky Agustin, Dallas Engler, (Beligan, Leah) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. Other error(s) with document(s): Attachment 1 Civil Cover Sheet should be e-filed separately. The event is located under Civil Events- Other Filings - Miscellaneous Filings and by selecting Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71). (car) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Michael L. Fradin. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (car) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney James L. Simon. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (car) |
| Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Amazon.com Services LLC. (car) |
| Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (car) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Lucky Agustin, Dallas Engler. (Beligan, Leah) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36771518 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff Dallas Engler, Lucky Agustin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Leah M. Beligan added to party Lucky Agustin(pty:bkmov), Attorney Leah M. Beligan added to party Dallas Engler(pty:bkmov))(Beligan, Leah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
