Andrew Klimkowski v. U.S. Department of Education et al
| Andrew Klimkowski |
| U.S. Department of Education, Miguel Cardona and Does 1-50, inclusive |
| 8:2024cv00163 |
| January 23, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| John D Early |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Andrew Klimkowski, upon Defendant Miguel Cardona served on 3/15/2024, answer due 5/14/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were NOT executed upon the United States Attorneys Office which was NOT served. The Attorney Generals Office of the United States was NOT served. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to "Delivered, front desk/reception/mail room". Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Certified Mail to US DOE 400 Maryland Ave., SW Washington, D.C. 20202 (Klimkowski, Andrew) |
| Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Andrew Klimkowski, upon Defendant U.S. Department of Education served on 3/11/2024, answer due 5/10/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to "Delivered, front desk/reception/mail room". The Attorney Generals Office of the United States was NOT served. The officer agency or corporation was NOT served. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Defendant U.S. Department of Education was served by Certified Mail to Civil Process Clerk US Attorney's Office Cent. Dist. of California (Klimkowski, Andrew) |
| Filing 14 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendants Miguel Cardona, U.S. Department of Education. (twdb) |
| Filing 13 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint - (Discovery), #1 filed by plaintiff Andrew Klimkowski. (Klimkowski, Andrew) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #11 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (twdb) |
| Filing 11 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint - (Discovery), #1 filed by plaintiff Andrew Klimkowski. (Klimkowski, Andrew) |
| Filing 10 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER. (kdu) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (et) |
Filing 9
ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: granting #3 APPLICATION for Pro Se Electronic Filing. The applicant must register to use the Courts CM/ECF System within five (5) days of being served with this order. Registration information is available at the Pro Se Litigant E-Filing web page located on the Courts website. Upon registering, the applicant will receive a CM/ECF login and password that will allow him/her to file non-sealed documents electronically in this case only. Any documents being submitted under seal must be manually filed with the Clerk. (bm)
|
| Filing 5 FINANCIAL ENTRY: Received $405.00 into the registry of the Court from Andrew Klimkowski. Receipt number 650. (ev) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE RE: DISCREPANCIES WITH FILING OF COMPLAINT OR NOTICE OF REMOVAL mailed to Plaintiff Andrew Klimkowski. Upon filing of your complaint, the following discrepancy was found: You have submitted a personal check. Please be advised that personal checks are not accepted. Your check will be returned to you by our Fiscal Department. Please send a cashiers check or money order instead. Be sure to reference the civil case number on your payment. If you do not respond within THIRTY DAYS from the date above, your action will be dismissed or remanded to state court, as appropriate. If your fee waiver request or payment is received within THIRTY DAYS, judges will be assigned to your case. You may return your fee waiver request or payment to any of the Courthouses listed on this notice. Re Complaint - (Discovery) #1 . (et) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION for Pro Se Litigant to electronically file documents in a specific case filed by Plaintiff Andrew Klimkowski. (et) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Andrew Klimkowski. (et) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF against Defendants Miguel Cardona, Does 1-50, inclusive, U.S. Department of Education. Case assigned to Judge David O. Carter for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge John D. Early. Jury Demanded., (Filing fee: $405 PAID on 1/29/2024 Receipt No. 650) filed by Plaintiff Andrew Klimkowski. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (et) Modified on 2/2/2024 (et). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
