Mario Ponce v. T.J. Maxx of CA, LLC
| Mario Ponce |
| T.J. MAXX OF CA, LLC and DOES 1- 50, inclusive |
| 8:2024cv00191 |
| January 26, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fred W Slaughter |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION TO SUBMIT CLAIMS TO ARBITRATION AND STAY ACTION #13 by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. The Court ORDERS the following: The above-captioned case is STAYED pending completion of the arbitration, or until further order of the court. The court will retain jurisdiction for the limited purpose of entertaining statutory proceedings, including a petition to confirm, vacate, or correct any arbitration award, and/or dismiss the above- captioned case; and The Parties shall FILE a Joint Status Report regarding the progress and status of the binding arbitration every ninety (90) days, with the first Joint Status Report due on May 13, 2024. [See order for other information.] Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lom)
|
| Filing 13 Joint STIPULATION to Stay Case pending completion of the arbitration filed by Defendant T.J. Maxx of CA, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Joint Stipulation to Submit Claims to Arbitration and Stay Action)(Vizzo, Andrea) |
| Filing 12 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Plaintiff Mario Ponce.. (Hirsch, Paul) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Mario Ponce, (Hirsch, Paul) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER SETTING RULE 26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. Scheduling Conference set for 3/21/2024 at 9:00 a.m. See Order for details. (mku)
|
|
Filing 9
CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. (mku)
|
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fred W. Slaughter and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (jtil) |
| NON CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by Defendant T.J. Maxx of CA, LLC, attached to Brophy Decl. as Exhibit B.(jtil) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Mario Ponce in Orange County Superior Court on 12/12/2023, attached to Brophy Decl. as Exhibit A. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant T.J. MAXX OF CA, LLC, re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #4 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 served on 01/26/2024. (Vizzo, Andrea) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant T.J. MAXX OF CA, LLC (Vizzo, Andrea) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant T.J. MAXX OF CA, LLC, identifying Mario Ponce and T.J. Maxx of CA, LLC,. (Vizzo, Andrea) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant T.J. MAXX OF CA, LLC. (Vizzo, Andrea) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2023-01367464-CU-WT-CJC Receipt No: ACACDC-36805125 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendant T.J. MAXX OF CA, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration, #3 Declaration) (Attorney Andrea Vizzo added to party T.J. MAXX OF CA, LLC(pty:dft))(Vizzo, Andrea) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
