Allyson Jean Blogren v. Stanbridge University et al
| Allyson Jean Blogren |
| Stanbridge University and LaPalma Inter Community Hospital |
| 8:2024cv00193 |
| January 29, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 NOTICE OF FILING TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings 2-2-24 1:48 p.m. re Transcript #23 THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (Seffens, Sharon) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 23 TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on 2-2-24 1:48 p.m. Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder: Sharon A Seffens, phone number sseffens@earthlink.net. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 3/22/2024. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 4/1/2024. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 5/30/2024. (Seffens, Sharon) |
| Filing 21 TRANSCRIPT ORDER as to Defendant Stanbridge University for Court Reporter. Court will contact Karen Alexander at KLAlexander@duanemorris.com with further instructions regarding this order. Transcript preparation will not begin until payment has been satisfied with the court reporter. (Alexander, Karen) |
| Filing 22 MINUTES OF SHOW CAUSE HEARING held before Judge David O. Carter: The case is called. The Court and counsel confer. The Plaintiff moves to Voluntarily dismiss this case without prejudice. The Court orders all proceedings in the case VACATED and taken off calendar. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) APPEARANCES: For Plaintiff(s): Anthony James Francisco; For Defendant(s): Karen Lehmann Alexander and Ron Hodges; Courtroom Deputy Clerk: Karlen Dubon; Court Reporter: Sharon Seffens; Time in Court: 0:20. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kdu) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 20 RESPONSE filed by Defendant LaPalma Inter Community Hospitalto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, #11 Specially Appearing Defendant La Palma Intercommunity Hospitals Response to the Courts Order to Show Cause as to Why a Preliminary Injunction Should not Issue with Proof of Service (Hodges, Ronald) |
| Filing 19 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge David O. Carter Show Cause Hearing set for 2/2/2024 is ADVANCED to 01:30 PM before Judge David O. Carter. **TIME CHANGE ONLY**THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kdu) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 18 OPPOSITION to for Temporary Restraining Order #1 filed by Defendant Stanbridge University. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Tracy Williams in Support of Stanbridge Universitys Opposition to Plaintiffs Request for a Preliminary Injunction Order, with Exhibit A, #2 Declaration of Yasith Weerasuriya in support of Stanbridge Universitys Opposition to Plaintiffs Request for a Preliminary Injunction Order, with Exhibits A-D)(Alexander, Karen) |
| Filing 17 RESPONSE filed by Defendant LaPalma Inter Community Hospitalto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, #11 Specially Appearing Defendant La Palma Intercommunity Hospitals Response To The Courts Order To Show Cause (OSC) As To Why A Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue with proof of service (Hodges, Ronald) |
| Filing 16 Corporate Disclosure Statement and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Stanbridge University, identifying Stanbridge University. (Cramp, Edward) |
| Filing 15 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Karen Lehmann Alexander counsel for Defendant Stanbridge University. Adding Karen L. Alexander as counsel of record for Defendant Stanbridge University for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Stanbridge University. (Attorney Karen Lehmann Alexander added to party Stanbridge University(pty:dft))(Alexander, Karen) |
| Filing 14 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Edward M Cramp counsel for Defendant Stanbridge University. Adding Edward M. Cramp as counsel of record for Defendant Stanbridge University for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Stanbridge University. (Attorney Edward M Cramp added to party Stanbridge University(pty:dft))(Cramp, Edward) |
| Filing 13 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge David O. Carter Show Cause Hearing set for 2/2/2024 is CONTNUED to 04:00 PM before Judge David O. Carter. **TIME CHANGE ONLY** THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kdu) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 12 FOR COURT USE ONLY: STATISTICAL CORRECTION MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge David O. Carter: granting #1 EX PARTE APPLICATION for TRO AND OSC RE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. (twdb) |
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge David O. Carter: ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND OSC RE PRELIMINARY #1 . Defendants are FURTHER ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why a preliminary injunction should not issue. The hearing on this Order to Show Cause is set before this Court on February 2, 2024, at 7:30 a.m. Plaintiff must file any additional supporting papers by January 31, 2024 at 5:00 p.m. Defendant shall file any opposition papers by February 1, 2024 at 5:00 p.m. The TRO shall remain in effect until the Court rules on the preliminary injunction. SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. (twdb)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Allyson Jean Blogren, (Francisco, Anthony) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #2 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (ghap) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 MEMORANDUM of Points and Authorities in Support filed by Plaintiff Allyson Blomgren. Re: Application/Motion/Request (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #2 (Francisco, Anthony) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Movant Allyson Blomgren. (Francisco, Anthony) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of Anthony J Francisco re Application/Motion/Request (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #2 filed by Movant Allyson Blomgren. (Francisco, Anthony) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid (405.00 paid on 01/29/2024, receipt number 36808190), filed by Plaintiff Allyson Blomgren.(Francisco, Anthony) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Orders (1) Staying Dismissial from Nursing Program 2. Prohibiting Destruction of Documents 3. To show Cause Re Preliminary Injunction Receipt No: ACACDC-36808190 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff Allyson Blomgren. (Attorney Anthony James Francisco added to party Allyson Blomgren(pty:bkmov))(Francisco, Anthony) Modified on 1/29/2024 (twdb). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
