Cameron Harrell v. AMG5 Pizza Restaurants PJS2, LLC et al
| Cameron Harrell |
| AMG5 Pizza Restaurants PJS2, LLC and John J. Loporto |
| 8:2024cv00209 |
| January 31, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Brianna Fuller Mircheff |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Cameron Harrell. (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 13
ORDER STAYING ACTION PENDING FINAL SETTLEMENT, REMOVING CASE FROM ACTIVE CASELOAD, AND FILING OF DISMISSAL by Judge Josephine L. Staton. On 3/8/2024, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Settlement (Doc. #12 ), indicating that the case has fully settled. Based thereon, the Court hereby orders all proceedings in the case stayed and that this action is removed from the Court's active caseload. The parties shall file a Stipulation of Dismissal no later than 4/7/2024. Until the Dismissal Date, the Court retains full jurisdiction over this action. Any outstanding Orders to Show Cause are discharged. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated). (jp)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Plaintiff Cameron Harrell. (Kim, Jason) |
|
Filing 11
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause Re Supplemental Jurisdiction by Judge Josephine L. Staton: Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause, in writing, no later than ten (10) days from the date of this Order, why the Court should not decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs Unruh Act claim and other state-law claims. (jp)
|
| Filing 10 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (rolm) |
|
Filing 9
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON by Judge Josephine L. Staton. PLEASE READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT GOVERNS THIS CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Josephine L. Staton. Both the Court and counsel bear responsibility for the progress of this litigation in federal court. To "secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination" of this case, as called for in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 1, all parties or their counsel are ordered to become familiar with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Rules of the Central District of California, and this Court's Orders. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) (rolm)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants AMG5 Pizza Restaurants PJS2, LLC, John J. Loporto. (lh) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Brianna Fuller Mircheff. (lh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Cameron Harrell. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Cameron Harrell. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36830459 - Fee: $405. (Attorney Jason J. Kim added to party Cameron Harrell(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
