Danny Ray Noriega v. Martin O'Malley
DANNY RAY NORIEGA |
MARTIN O'MALLEY |
8:2024cv00287 |
February 9, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Maria A Audero |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero for all further proceedings. Please use the case number 8:24-cv-00287-MAA on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. RE: Consent to Proceed before U S Magistrate Judge (AUSA filers only) - Non-Final #9 . THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (et) |
Filing 9 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Martin O'Malley. (Attorney Michael K Marriott added to party Martin O'Malley(pty:dft))(Marriott, Michael) |
Filing 8 INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER REGARDING PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. See document for details and deadlines. (Attachments: #1 Attachment) (es) |
Filing 7 ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (NON-PRISONER CASE)by Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: The Request is GRANTED.; granting #4 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (aco) |
Filing 6 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by PLAINTIFF Danny Ray Noriega. (Attorney Alex Panutich added to party Danny Ray Noriega(pty:pla))(Panutich, Alex) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Kenly Kiya Kato and referred to Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (sh) |
Filing 4 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff DANNY RAY NORIEGA. (Warren, Jessica) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff DANNY RAY NORIEGA, (Warren, Jessica) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff DANNY RAY NORIEGA. (Warren, Jessica) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff DANNY RAY NORIEGA. (Attorney Jessica Elizabeth Warren added to party DANNY RAY NORIEGA(pty:pla))(Warren, Jessica) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Danny Ray Noriega v. Martin O'Malley | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: DANNY RAY NORIEGA | |
Represented By: | Jessica Elizabeth Warren |
Represented By: | Alex Panutich |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: MARTIN O'MALLEY | |
Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA |
Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney SA-CV |
Represented By: | Michael K Marriott |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.