Mary Friesen v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
| MARY FRIESEN |
| Costco Wholesale Corporation and Does 1-100 |
| Diane Faber |
| 8:2024cv00296 |
| February 12, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| John D Early |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 25 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by plaintiff Mary Friesen. Dismissal is with prejudice. (Brandenburg, Emily) |
Filing 24
ORDER by District Judge David O. Carter: The Court, having been notified by the plaintiff that this action has been settled re Notice of Settlement #23 , hereby orders this action DISMISSED without prejudice. The Court hereby orders all proceedings in the case VACATED and taken off calendar. The Court retains jurisdiction for 45 days to vacate this order and reopen the action upon showing of good cause that the settlement has not been consummated. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kdu) TEXT ONLY ENTRY.
|
| Filing 23 NOTICE of Settlement filed by plaintiff Mary Friesen. (Brandenburg, Emily) |
| Filing 22 MEDIATION REPORT Filed by Mediator (ADR Panel) Diane Faber: Mediation held on March 26, 2024 and the case has been completely settled. With the filing of this Report, the parties are advised that they must notify the trial judge's deputy courtroom clerk of the fact of settlement and to promptly file documents regarding the final disposition of the case. Counsel: Please evaluate the effectiveness of the ADR Program by completing a survey on your mediation experience. To access the survey, click on the following link: #MediationParticipantSurvey(Faber, Diane) |
| Filing 21 NOTICE OF MEDIATION DATE filed. Mediation set for March 26, 2024 at 1:30 p.m..(Faber, Diane) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE OF MEDIATION DATE filed. Mediation set for March 26, 2024.(Faber, Diane) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Panel Mediator. Mediator (ADR Panel) Diane Faber has been assigned to serve as Panel Mediator. (lst) |
| Filing 18 STIPULATION REGARDING SELECTION of Panel Mediator filed. Parties stipulate that Diane Faber may serve as Panel Mediator. Plaintiff obtained the Panel Mediators consent to serve. All parties and the Panel Mediator have agreed that the mediation will be held on 3/26/2024 and counsel will submit mediation statements seven (7) calendar days before the session. Filed by Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation(Delgado, William) |
|
Filing 17
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge David O. Carter: Granting Stipulation and Joint Request to Assign Case to Panel Mediation (30 days or less), #13 . SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. (twdb)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 2 by Judge David O. Carter. Case ordered to Court Mediation Panel for mediation. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 4/8/2024. (kdu)
|
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation, identifying Costco Wholesale Corporation, Mary Friesen. (Delgado, William) |
| Filing 14 STIPULATION for Consideration of Request to Assign Case to Panel Mediation filed by Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Delgado, William) |
| Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Costco Wholesale Corporation answer now due 4/8/2024, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation.(Attorney William A. Delgado added to party Costco Wholesale Corporation(pty:dft))(Delgado, William) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Mary Friesen, upon Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation served on 2/15/2024, answer due 3/7/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Brandenburg, Emily) |
| Filing 11 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER. (kdu) |
| Filing 10 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Mary Friesen. (Brandenburg, Emily) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO COUNSEL RE: Copyright, Patent and Trademark Reporting Requirements. Counsel shall file the appropriate AO-120 and/or AO-121 form with the Clerk within 10 days. (et) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation. (et) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (et) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff MARY FRIESEN, identifying MARY FRIESEN; EMILY BRANDENBURG; THE KEARNEY FIRM, APC; COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION. (Brandenburg, Emily) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by Plaintiff MARY FRIESEN. (Brandenburg, Emily) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff MARY FRIESEN. (Brandenburg, Emily) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36900131 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff MARY FRIESEN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B) (Attorney Emily Anne Brandenburg added to party MARY FRIESEN(pty:pla))(Brandenburg, Emily) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
