United States of America v. 215,566.31 Seized from One Bank of America Account
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
$215,566.31 SEIZED FROM ONE BANK OF AMERICA ACCOUNT and 215,566.31 Seized from One Bank of America Account |
8:2024cv00373 |
February 22, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Wesley L Hsu |
Douglas F McCormick |
Forfeit/Penalty: Other |
18 U.S.C. ยง 0981 Civil Forfeiture |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Appoint Substitute Custodian United States Secret Service in place of United States Marshals Service. filed by plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Dochterman, James) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Dochterman, James) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT No Fee Required - US Government, filed by plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Attorney James Edmund Dochterman added to party UNITED STATES OF AMERICA(pty:pla))(Dochterman, James) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: You have attempted to open this case electronically but have failed to upload successfully the required PDF version of any initiating document, such as a complaint or notice of removal. You must file an initiating document within two business days of this notice or the docket for this case number will be closed. (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.