John Lee v. Gregorio Muniz et al
John Lee |
Gregorio Muniz doing business as Los Alazanes Mexican Food, Greg Ronald Velasquez and Does 1 to 10 |
8:2024cv00374 |
February 22, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John D Early |
Fred W Slaughter |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to Defendant Gregorio Muniz dba Los Alazanes Mexican Food. (jp) |
Filing 16 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Gregorio Muniz filed by Plaintiff John Lee. (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff John Lee, upon Defendant Greg Ronald Velasquez served on 4/15/2024, answer due 5/6/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon John Doe, a person at lease 18 years of age apparently in charge at the office or usual place of business of the person to be served in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 14 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Fred W. Slaughter: The Court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS plaintiff, to show cause in writing no later than 4/17/2024, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. See document for further information. (jp) |
Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff John Lee, upon Defendant Gregorio Muniz served on 3/18/2024, answer due 4/8/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon GREGORIO MUNIZ D/B/A LOS ALAZANES MEXICAN FOOD, defendant in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 12 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S STATE LAW CLAIMS by Judge Fred W. Slaughter: The court DISMISSES Plaintiff's state law claims (Causes of Action Two, Three, Four, and Five) WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to any action filed in state court. (jp) |
Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff John Leeto Order to Show Cause, #9 re: Supplemental Jurisdiction (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration)(Kim, Jason) |
Filing 10 CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. (mku) |
Filing 9 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause Re: Supplemental Jurisdiction by Judge Fred W. Slaughter: The court ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause in writing why this court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims asserted in the Complaint on or before 3/18/2024, at 5:00 PM. (jp) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Gregorio Muniz, Greg Ronald Velasquez. (ghap) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fred W. Slaughter and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (ghap) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 John Lee. (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff John Lee. (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36960272 - Fee: $405. (Attorney Jason J. Kim added to party John Lee(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.