Janae Gee v. Sentry Insurance Company et al
Janae Gee |
Sentry Insurance Company, DOES 1 - 50, Nic Hernandez, Doe and Does 2-50 |
8:2024cv00394 |
February 26, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Karen E Scott |
Fred W Slaughter |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 ORDER Re Stipulation for Continuance of Rule 26(F) Scheduling Conference #22 by Judge Fred W. Slaughter, the court ORDERS the following: The Rule 26(f) Scheduling Conference currently set on 6/13/2024, at 9:00 AM., is CONTINUED to 7/11/2024 at 09:00 AM. See document for further information. (jp) |
Filing 22 STIPULATION to Continue Rule 26(F) Scheduling Conference from June 13, 2024 at 9:00am to July 11, 2024 at 9:00am Re: Initial Order Setting R26 Scheduling Conference - form only #21 filed by Plaintiff Janae Gee. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order to Continue 26(F) Scheduling Conference Hearing for Good Cause)(Campbell, Paul) |
Filing 21 ORDER SETTING RULE 26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. Scheduling Conference set for 6/13/2024 at 9:00 a.m. *See Order for details.* (mku) |
Filing 20 ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition #17 filed by Defendant Sentry Insurance Company.(Cabrera, Krista) |
Filing 19 ORDER RE STIPULATION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S NINTH CAUSE OF ACTION FOR DEFAMATION WITH PREJUDICE AND TO DISMISS NIC HERNANDEZ WITH PREJUDICE #18 by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. The court ORDERS the following: 1. Plaintiff's Ninth Cause of Action for Defamation in the Second Amended Complaint #17 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 2. Hernandez is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE from the above-captioned action. 3. All parties shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs. (rolm) |
Filing 18 STIPULATION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Ninth Cause of Action for Defamation and Defendant Nic Hernandez filed by Defendant Nic Hernandez, Sentry Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Krista M Cabrera added to party Nic Hernandez(pty:dft))(Cabrera, Krista) |
Filing 17 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Defendants amending Amended Complaint,, filed by Plaintiff Janae Gee(Campbell, Paul) |
Filing 16 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Plaintiff Janae Gee.. (Campbell, Paul) |
Filing 15 ORDER Re Stipulation to extend Time for Defendant to File Responsive Pleading #7 by Judge Fred W. Slaughter, the court GRANTS the Stipulation and ORDERS the following: (1) Plaintiff JANAE GEE is GRANTED LEAVE TO FILE a Second Amended Complaint no later than 3/27/2024. (2) If Plaintiff files a SAC, Defendant SENTRY INSURANCE COMPANY's time to answer or otherwise respond to the SAC shall be on or before twenty-one (21 days) after the date the SAC has been filed. (3) In the event Plaintiff does not file a SAC, Defendant's deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint on file is 4/10/2024. (jp) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Janae Gee, identifying Janae Gee, an individual. (Campbell, Paul) |
Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Sentry Insurance Company, re Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only #12 served on 02/29/2024. (Cabrera, Krista) |
Filing 12 CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. (mku) |
Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Sentry Insurance Company, re Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #8 , Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #9 , Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form #10 served on 02/28/2024. (Cabrera, Krista) |
Filing 10 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
Filing 9 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fred W. Slaughter and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (ghap) |
Filing 7 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to April 10, 2024 filed by Defendant Sentry Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Cabrera, Krista) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-50, Sentry Insurance Company., filed by plaintiff Janae Gee. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 2/19/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap) |
NON CONFORM COPY OF NOTICE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Janae Gee, upon Defendant Sentry Insurance Company acknowledgment sent by Plaintiff on 1/26/2024, answer due 2/16/2024. Acknowledgment of Service signed by Krista Cabrera, Attorney for Defendant Sentry Insurance Company. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT D) (ghap) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 2-5, Nic Hernandez, Sentry Insurance Company amending Complaint - (Discovery), filed by plaintiff Janae Gee. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 1/26/2024 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT B)(ghap) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Janae Gee, upon Defendant Sentry Insurance Company served on 12/22/2023, answer due 1/12/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CT Corporation System-Sarai Marin, Intake Specialist-Person Authorized to Accept Service of Process in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 12/26/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT F) (ghap) |
CONFORMED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Janae Gee, upon Defendant Sentry Insurance Company served on 1/26/2024, answer due 2/16/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Krista Cabrera, Attorney, 11988 El Camino Real Suite 400, San Diego, CA 92130 in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by method of service not specified. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 2/16/2024 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT F) (ghap) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Sentry Insurance Company, of Notice to Superior Court and Adverse Parties of Removal of Action to United States District Court served on 02/26/2024. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Notice to Superior Court of Removal)(Cabrera, Krista) |
Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Sentry Insurance Company, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #4 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 served on 02/26/2024. (Cabrera, Krista) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Sentry Insurance Company identifying Sentry Holdings, Inc. and Sentry Mutual Holding Company as Corporate Parent. (Cabrera, Krista) |
Filing 3 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Sentry Insurance Company, identifying Sentry Mutual Holding Company, Sentry Holdings, Inc., Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America. (Cabrera, Krista) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Sentry Insurance Company. (Cabrera, Krista) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2023-01368662-CU-WT-CJC Receipt No: ACACDC-36982083 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendant Sentry Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Javier Sotelo, #2 Declaration of Krista Cabrera, #3 Exhibit A - Complaint, #4 Exhibit B - Amended Complaint, #5 Exhibit C - Email, #6 Exhibit D - Email, #7 Exhibit E - State Court Docket, #8 Exhibit F - State Court Pleadings) (Attorney Krista M. Cabrera added to party Sentry Insurance Company(pty:dft))(Cabrera, Krista) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.