Nayerehzaman Rashidian et al v. Antony J. Blinken et al
Nayerehzaman Rashidian, Masoud Rashidian, Farideh Assadiamoli and Pegah Rashidian |
Antony J. Blinken and Rena Bitter |
8:2024cv00396 |
February 26, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Sherilyn Peace Garnett |
Autumn D Spaeth |
Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. (pg) |
Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Pegah Rashidian, Nayerehzaman Rashidian, Farideh Assadiamoli, Masoud Rashidian, upon Defendant Rena Bitter served on 3/18/2024, answer due 5/17/2024; Antony J. Blinken served on 3/18/2024, answer due 5/17/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Ati, Ines) |
Filing 10 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge James V. Selna. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 23-05. Case randomly reassigned from Judge James V. Selna to Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 8:24-cv-00396-SPG-(ADSx). (dve) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Summons did not attach to docket entry. Docket item #7 should be disregarded. (car) |
Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendants Rena Bitter, Antony J. Blinken. (car) |
Filing 7 [NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR ISSUED ON 2/28/2024, SEE ITEM 9 60 DAY Summons Issued re Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendants Rena Bitter, Antony J. Blinken. (car) Modified on 2/28/2024 (car). |
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (car) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs-Petitioners Farideh Assadiamoli, Masoud Rashidian, Nayerehzaman Rashidian, Pegah Rashidian, (Ati, Ines) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening),,, #1 filed by Plaintiffs-Petitioners Farideh Assadiamoli, Masoud Rashidian, Nayerehzaman Rashidian, Pegah Rashidian. (Ati, Ines) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Farideh Assadiamoli, Masoud Rashidian, Nayerehzaman Rashidian, Pegah Rashidian. (Ati, Ines) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Mandamus and Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief Receipt No: ACACDC-36980550 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiffs-Petitioners Pegah Rashidian, Nayerehzaman Rashidian, Farideh Assadiamoli, Masoud Rashidian. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certificate, #2 Exhibit B - DS5535, #3 Exhibit C - Passports, #4 Exhibit D - Supplemental Questions, #5 Exhibit E - Email to Embassy, #6 Exhibit F - Email to Embassy 2, #7 Exhibit G - Email from Embassy, #8 Exhibit H - Email from Embassy 2, #9 Exhibit I - CEAC Status) (Attorney Ines Ati added to party Farideh Assadiamoli(pty:pla), Attorney Ines Ati added to party Masoud Rashidian(pty:pla), Attorney Ines Ati added to party Nayerehzaman Rashidian(pty:pla), Attorney Ines Ati added to party Pegah Rashidian(pty:pla))(Ati, Ines) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.