Zeyu Li v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
| Zeyu Li |
| United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Terri Robinson |
| 8:2024cv00481 |
| March 6, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Consuelo B Marshall |
| Karen E Scott |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT #11 by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. IT IS SO ORDERED that the current time within which Defendants must answer, plead, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint shall be extended from May 13, 2024, the date such filing(s) are currently due, to July 12, 2024. (rolm)
|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to 7/12/2024 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Terri Robinson, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Richard C. Burson added to party Ur Mendoza Jaddou(pty:dft), Attorney Richard C. Burson added to party Terri Robinson(pty:dft), Attorney Richard C. Burson added to party United States Citizenship and Immigration Services(pty:dft))(Burson, Richard) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Zeyu Li, re Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only #9 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit mail receipt)(Castro, Christina) |
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. It controls this case and may differ in some respects from the Local Rules. See order for details. (ys)
|
| Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Zeyu Li, upon Defendant Ur Mendoza Jaddou served on 3/18/2024, answer due 5/17/2024; Terri Robinson served on 3/18/2024, answer due 5/17/2024; United States Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 3/18/2024, answer due 5/17/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to T, Delarosa. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Eddie L. Anderson. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to x. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit mail receipt)(Castro, Christina) |
| Filing 7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Terri Robinson, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. (shb) |
| Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Zeyu Li. (Castro, Christina) |
| Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (jtil) |
| Filing 3 Notice Notice of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Zeyu Li. (Castro, Christina) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Zeyu Li. (Castro, Christina) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-37038516 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff Zeyu Li. (Attorney Christina Sullivan Castro added to party Zeyu Li(pty:pla))(Castro, Christina) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
