Ebitari Larsen v. Citibank, N.A.
Ebitari Larsen |
Citibank, N.A., and Citibank, N.A. |
8:2024cv00494 |
March 7, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Douglas F McCormick |
Fred W Slaughter |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 MOTION TO STRIKE UNAUTHORIZED SUR-REPLY re PETITION to Compel Arbitration #9 filed by Defendant Citibank, N.A.. (Thomason, Ryan) |
Filing 20 REPLY PLAINTIFFS REPLY TO DEFENDANT CITIBANK, N.A.S REPLY TO PLAINTIFF EBITARI LARSENS OPPOSITION TO PETITION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION filed by Plaintiff Ebitari Larsen. (Larsen, Ebitari) |
Filing 19 REPLY to Opposition to PETITION to Compel Arbitration #9 filed by Defendant Citibank, N.A.. (Thomason, Ryan) |
Filing 18 Notice filed by Plaintiff Ebitari Larsen. Ebitari Larsen (Larsen, Ebitari) |
Filing 17 OPPOSITION filed by Plaintiff Ebitari Larsen. (Larsen, Ebitari) |
Filing 16 CORRECTED DISCOVERY MATTER Ebitari Larsen Name Change Case #14 filed by plaintiff Ebitari Larsen. (jp) |
Filing 15 CORRECTED DISCOVERY MATTER SUBPOENA on Citibank, N.A., and ADR #13 filed by Plaintiff Ebitari Larsen. (jp) |
Filing 14 DISCOVERY MATTER Ebitari Larsen Name Change Case filed by plaintiff Ebitari Larsen. (jp) |
Filing 13 DISCOVERY MATTER SUBPOENA on Citibank, N.A., and ADR filed by Plaintiff Ebitari Larsen. (jp) |
![]() |
Filing 10 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge Fred W. Slaughter: The court hereby SETS a hearing on Defendant's Petition to Compel Arbitration #9 for May 9, 2024 at 10:00 a.m. The hearing shall proceed IN PERSON as to all parties in Courtroom 10D of the Ronald Reagan Federal Building and United States Courthouse, 411 West 4th Street, Santa Ana, CA 92701. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (mku) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 9 PETITION to Compel Arbitration filed by Defendant Citibank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Proof of Service) (Thomason, Ryan) |
Filing 11 APPLICATION for Pro Se Litigant to electronically file documents in a specific case filed by plaintiff Ebitari Larsen. (jp) |
Filing 8 DECLARATION of Ryan Thomason regarding Certificate of Service filed by Defendant Citibank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 proof of service)(Thomason, Ryan) |
![]() |
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fred W. Slaughter and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (ghap) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendant Citibank, N.A., filed by plaintiff Ebitari Larsen. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 1/22/2024 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Citibank, N.A., identifying Citigroup, Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Thomason, Ryan) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Citibank, N.A.,. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Thomason, Ryan) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2024-01374529 Receipt No: ACACDC-37048751 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendant Citibank, N.A.,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Notice of Removal Proof of Service) (Attorney Ryan Curtis Thomason added to party Citibank, N.A.,(pty:dft))(Thomason, Ryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.