Maral Behnam v. United States Department of State et al
| MARAL BEHNAM |
| Department of State, ANTHONY BLINKEN, Rena Bitter, Department of Homeland Security, AJELANDRO MAYORKAS, US Customs and Border Protection and NATIONAL VETTING CENTER |
| 8:2024cv00587 |
| March 20, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff MARAL BEHNAM, identifying none. (Behzadi, Ken) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff MARAL BEHNAM. (Behzadi, Ken) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff MARAL BEHNAM. (Behzadi, Ken) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-37127682 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff MARAL BEHNAM. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Naturalization Certificate, #2 Exhibit I-797 Receipt for Filing, #3 Exhibit I-797 approval, #4 Exhibit NVC PROCESSING, #5 Exhibit DS-160 RECEIPT, #6 Exhibit EMBASSY REJECTION LETTER, #7 Exhibit ATTY INQUIRIES, #8 Exhibit DOS MEMO) (Attorney Ken K. Behzadi added to party MARAL BEHNAM(pty:pla))(Behzadi, Ken) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
