Rica Ty v. Alejandro N. Mayorkas
| Rica Ty |
| Alejandro N. Mayorkas |
| 8:2024cv00760 |
| April 8, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| John F Walter |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to David Radel. (iv) |
| Filing 21 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendant Alejandro N. Mayorkas. (iv) |
| Filing 20 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Civil Process Clerk. (iv) |
| Filing 19 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendant Alejandro N. Mayorkas. (iv) |
Filing 18
ORDER by Judge John F. Walter: Granting #9 APPLICATION for Pro Se Electronic Filing. The applicant must register to use the Courts CM/ECF System within five (5) days of being served with this order. Registration information is available at the Pro Se Litigant E-Filing web page located on the Courts website. Upon registering, the applicant will receive a CM/ECF login and password that will allow him/her to file non-sealed documents electronically in this case only. Any documents being submitted under seal must be manually filed with the Clerk. (iv)
|
| Filing 16 FINANCIAL ENTRY: Received $405.00 into the registry of the Court from Rica Ty. Re: Complaint - (Discovery), #1 . Receipt number Pay.gov Tracking Id: 27E9DR05. (chs) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE OF PAYMENT filed by Plaintiff Rica Ty. (iv) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #11 , #12 , #13 , #14 . The following error(s) was found: Summons can not be issued as request filed prematurely. Pursuant to the Court's Order (Dkt. 10) filing fee must be paid.The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (iv) |
| Filing 14 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint - (Discovery), #1 filed by Plaintiff Rica Ty. (iv) |
| Filing 13 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint - (Discovery), #1 filed by Plaintiff Rica Ty. (iv) |
| Filing 12 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint - (Discovery), #1 filed by Plaintiff Rica Ty. (iv) |
| Filing 11 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint - (Discovery), #1 filed by Plaintiff Rica Ty. (iv) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS #3 by Judge John F. Walter. The Request is DENIED because the filer has the ability to pay. Within 30 days of the date of this Order, the filer must do the following: (1) pay the full filing fee of $402; AND (2) file a notice with the Court indicating the filing fee has been paid. (iv)
|
| Filing 9 APPLICATION for Pro Se Litigant to electronically file documents in a specific case filed by Plaintiff Rica Ty. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (iv) |
|
Filing 8
SELF- REPRESENTATION ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. One or more of the parties to this action has elected to appear pro se. Persons appearing before this Court are not required to retain the services of a lawyer or obtain the advice of counsel. Individual litigants may represent themselves pro se, but corporations and associations must be represented by counsel. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) (rolm)
|
|
Filing 7
STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. Both the Court and counsel bear responsibility for the progress of litigation in Federal Court. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) (rolm)
|
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (lh) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Rica Ty. (lh) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Rica Ty, (lh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendant Alejandro N. Mayorkas. Case assigned to Judge John F. Walter for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Rica Ty. (Attachments: #1 Part 2 of 5 to Complaint, #2 Part 3 of 5 to Complaint, #3 Part 4 of 5 to Complaint, #4 Part 5 of 5 to Complaint, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Summons Request) (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rica Ty v. Alejandro N. Mayorkas | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rica Ty | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Alejandro N. Mayorkas | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
