Chien Tran v. Safeco Insurance Company of America et al
| Chien Tran |
| Safeco Insurance Company of America and Erica Purdy |
| 8:2024cv00765 |
| April 8, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Safeco Insurance Company of America. (Boos, Nicholas) |
| Filing 3 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Defendant Safeco Insurance Company of America.. (Boos, Nicholas) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Safeco Insurance Company of America, identifying Safeco Corporation, Liberty Mutual Agency Corporation, Liberty Insurance Holdings, Inc., Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Group, Inc., LMHC Massachusetts Holdings Inc., Liberty Mutual Holding Company, Inc.. (Boos, Nicholas) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of Orange County, case number 30-2023-01332825 Receipt No: ACACDC-37246137 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendant Safeco Insurance Company of America. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Corban J. Porter) (Attorney Nicholas J. Boos added to party Safeco Insurance Company of America(pty:dft))(Boos, Nicholas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
