Ameris Bank v. Sky Vision Inc. et al
| Ameris Bank, a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation doing business as Vendor Services Center |
| Sky Vision Inc. and Dusan Jovanovic |
| 8:2024cv00874 |
| April 22, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Ameris Bank, a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation, identifying Balboa Capital Corporation, Ameris Bank, and Vendor Services Center. (Salisian, Neal) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Ameris Bank, a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation. (Salisian, Neal) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Ameris Bank, a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation. (Salisian, Neal) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-37329387 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff Ameris Bank, a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-C) (Attorney Neal S Salisian added to party Ameris Bank, a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation(pty:pla))(Salisian, Neal) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
