WINNINGHOFF v. KASEYA US LLC et al
| COLE WINNINGHOFF |
| KASEYA US LLC and DOES 1 through 5, inclusive, |
| 8:2024cv01370 |
| June 21, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE filed by Defendant KASEYA US LLC. (Jarem, Russell) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by DEFENDANT KASEYA US LLC, identifying Defendant Kaseya US, LLC; Defendants parent corporation Kaseya, Inc.; Plaintiff Cole Winninghoff; The law firm of Jackson Lewis P.C., which represents Defendant Kaseya US, LLC; and The Law Offices of Corbett H. Williams, which represents Plaintiff Cole Winninghoff.. (Jarem, Russell) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant KASEYA US LLC identifying Kaseya, Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Jarem, Russell) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant KASEYA US LLC. (Jarem, Russell) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2024-01400810-CU-OE-NJC Receipt No: ACACDC-37696470 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendant KASEYA US LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration JESSICA MORRIS, #2 Declaration MOSSAMAT N. KARIM) (Attorney Russell Jarem added to party KASEYA US LLC(pty:dft))(Jarem, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
