Nichale Denby v. National Research Corporation
| Nichale Denby |
| DOES 1-10, inclusive and National Research Corporation |
| 8:2024cv01489 |
| July 5, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Receipt of REMAND LETTER from Orange County Superior Court (twdb) |
| Filing 13 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Orange County Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Orange County Superior Court. (twdb) |
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT SUA SPONTE by Judge David O. Carter. For the reasons set forth above, the Court hereby REMANDS this case to the Superior Court of California, County of Orange. All proceedings in this matter are hereby vacated and removed from calendar. Case number 30-2024-01403567-CU-OE-CJC. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (twdb)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge David O. Carter. Scheduling Conference set for 8/26/2024 at 08:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (kdu)
|
|
Filing 10
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE DAVID O. CARTER by Judge David O. Carter. (kdu)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge James V. Selna. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 23-05. Case randomly reassigned from Judge James V. Selna to Judge David O. Carter for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 8:24-cv-01489-DOC-(DFMx). (dve)
|
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant National Research Corporation, re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #4 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 served on July 5, 2024. (Akbarian, Tatyana) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant National Research Corporation (Akbarian, Tatyana) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant National Research Corporation, (Akbarian, Tatyana) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant National Research Corporation. (Akbarian, Tatyana) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2024-01403567-CU-OE-CJC Receipt No: ACACDC-37780528 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendant National Research Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of John Haubrich, Jr., #2 Declaration of Kelsey Scheider) (Attorney Tatyana Akbarian added to party National Research Corporation(pty:dft))(Akbarian, Tatyana) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Nichale Denby in Orange County Superior Court on 5/31/2024, attached to Haubrich's Decl. as Exhibit A. (jtil) |
| NON CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by Defendant National Research Corporation, attached to Haubrich Decl. as Exhibit D. (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
