Joseph Cockrell v. Navient Corporation et al
| Joseph Cockrell |
| Navient Solutions, LLC,, Navient Corporation and Does 1-10, inclusive |
| 8:2024cv01780 |
| August 14, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John D Early |
| James V Selna |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA. (eva) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Navient Corporation, Navient Solutions, LLC,. (lh) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (lh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Cockrell Joseph. (Preston, Ethan) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Cockrell Joseph (Preston, Ethan) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Cockrell Joseph. (Preston, Ethan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-38024189 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff Cockrell Joseph. (Attorney Ethan Preston added to party Cockrell Joseph(pty:pla))(Preston, Ethan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
