Matthew Gomez v. Christopher R Williams et al
| Matthew Gomez |
| Christopher R Williams and US Army |
| 8:2024cv01927 |
| September 5, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| Fred W Slaughter |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter DENYING REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60) #3 . This case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated.) (jp)
|
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fred W. Slaughter and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (sh) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Matthew Gomez. (sh) |
| Filing 2 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Matthew Gomez, (sh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants US Army, Christopher R Williams.Case assigned to Judge Fred W. Slaughter for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick., filed by Plaintiff Matthew Gomez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (sh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
